Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8199074: Test javax/swing/DataTransfer/8059739/bug8059739.java is unstable #850

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor

@prsadhuk prsadhuk commented Oct 24, 2020

Please review deproblemlisting of another test which was failing in mach5 testing. Seems like it was failing due to samevmrunnable problem which was fixed by running client test in othervm mode.
Mach5 job has been runn for several iterations in all platforms. Link in JBS.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Testing

Linux x32 Linux x64 Windows x64 macOS x64
Build ✔️ (1/1 passed) ✔️ (5/5 passed) ✔️ (2/2 passed) (1/2 failed)
Test (tier1) ✔️ (9/9 passed) (1/9 failed)

Failed test tasks

Issue

  • JDK-8199074: Test javax/swing/DataTransfer/8059739/bug8059739.java is unstable

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/850/head:pull/850
$ git checkout pull/850

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 24, 2020

👋 Welcome back psadhukhan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 24, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 24, 2020

@prsadhuk To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels
  • 2d
  • awt
  • beans
  • build
  • compiler
  • core-libs
  • hotspot
  • hotspot-compiler
  • hotspot-gc
  • hotspot-jfr
  • hotspot-runtime
  • i18n
  • javadoc
  • jdk
  • jmx
  • kulla
  • net
  • nio
  • security
  • serviceability
  • shenandoah
  • sound
  • swing

@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label add swing

@openjdk openjdk bot added the swing client-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 24, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 24, 2020

@prsadhuk
The swing label was successfully added.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 24, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 24, 2020

@prsadhuk This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8199074: Test javax/swing/DataTransfer/8059739/bug8059739.java is unstable

Reviewed-by: serb, prr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 29 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6545e19: 8255078: sun/net/ftp/imp/FtpClient$MLSxParser uses wrong datetime format
  • 3f6abd2: 8255330: gtest/MetaspaceGtests.java fail on 32-bit platforms
  • cf821b0: 8232024: Don't pollute log output with multiple errors of the same type
  • 185c8bc: 8255338: CodeSections are never frozen
  • cc86113: 8255271: Avoid generating duplicate interpreter entries for subword types
  • 5ec1b80: 8255287: aarch64: fix SVE patterns for vector shift count
  • 12daf2b: 8255340: [s390] build failure after JDK-8255208
  • 9007bc2: 8255129: [PPC64, s390] Check vector_size_supported and add VectorReinterpret node
  • df79257: 8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched
  • 55a0cad: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c
  • ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/cc50c8d4f18fb04a5d7b608d1cb250c1b3fd8690...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 24, 2020
@prsadhuk
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 25, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 25, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 25, 2020

@prsadhuk Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 6545e19: 8255078: sun/net/ftp/imp/FtpClient$MLSxParser uses wrong datetime format
  • 3f6abd2: 8255330: gtest/MetaspaceGtests.java fail on 32-bit platforms
  • cf821b0: 8232024: Don't pollute log output with multiple errors of the same type
  • 185c8bc: 8255338: CodeSections are never frozen
  • cc86113: 8255271: Avoid generating duplicate interpreter entries for subword types
  • 5ec1b80: 8255287: aarch64: fix SVE patterns for vector shift count
  • 12daf2b: 8255340: [s390] build failure after JDK-8255208
  • 9007bc2: 8255129: [PPC64, s390] Check vector_size_supported and add VectorReinterpret node
  • df79257: 8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched
  • 55a0cad: 8254982: (tz) Upgrade time-zone data to tzdata2020c
  • ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/cc50c8d4f18fb04a5d7b608d1cb250c1b3fd8690...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 69b0172.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@prsadhuk prsadhuk deleted the JDK-8199074 branch October 25, 2020 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated swing client-libs-dev@openjdk.org
3 participants