8286474: Drop --enable-preview from Sealed Classes related tests

[shipilev]

There are plenty of tests failing on many architectures due to --enable-preview VM code introduced by Loom. This improvement eliminates some of the redundant --enable-preview clauses from the Sealed Classes tests, since Sealed Classes have been graduated from preview in JDK 17.

Additional testing:

• Linux x86_64 fastdebug, affected tests still pass
• Linux x86_32 fastdebug, affected tests start to pass

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 reviewer)

Issue

• JDK-8286474: Drop --enable-preview from Sealed Classes related tests

Reviewers

• Alan Bateman (@AlanBateman - Reviewer)
• Jaikiran Pai (@jaikiran - Committer)
• Mandy Chung (@mlchung - Reviewer)
• Lance Andersen (@LanceAndersen - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8627/head:pull/8627
$ git checkout pull/8627

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8627
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8627/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8627

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8627

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8627.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@shipilev The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 01: Full - Incremental (1b74acf4)
• 00: Full (9b1a55a3)

[jaikiran]

The changes look fine to me. Both these files will need a copyright year update, I think.

[openjdk]

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8286474: Drop --enable-preview from Sealed Classes related tests

Reviewed-by: alanb, jpai, mchung, lancea

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 0f37736: 8282420: JFR: Remove event handlers
• 04bba07: 8286363: BigInteger.parallelMultiply missing @SInCE 19
• fa25733: 8286480: Remove the c1 getEventWriter() intrinsic to simplify post-Loom integration platform-porting efforts
• ecbb380: 8286303: Serial: Remove reference to ParGCRareEvent_lock
• 9835678: 8285710: Miscalculation of G1CardSetAllocator unused memory size
• 1ca5404: 8286125: C2: "bad AD file" with PopulateIndex on x86_64
• 9e320d9: 8286198: [linux] Fix process-memory information
• 65f5067: 8286429: jpackageapplauncher build fails intermittently in Tier[45]
• c4bd449: 8238373: Punctuation should be same in jlink help usage on Japanese language
• 3fa1c40: 8286298: Remove unused methods in sun.invoke.util.VerifyType
• ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/bf0dc4f844ca83855e7fde19313d92da055dcb77...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[shipilev]

Thanks!

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit d547a70.
Since your change was applied there have been 22 commits pushed to the master branch:

• aaeb08e: 8278123: serviceability/dcmd/vm/ClassLoaderStatsTest.java failing with java.lang.AssertionError: Should have a hidden class
• 070a0cd: 8286551: JDK-8286460 causes tests to fail to compile in Tier2
• dcec1d2: 8286368: Cleanup problem lists after loom integration
• 7704eb1: 8284980: Test vmTestbase/nsk/stress/except/except010.java times out with -Xcomp -XX:+DeoptimizeALot
• d347fc1: 8286438: Add jhsdb jstack processing without --mixed in efh
• 61c68ab: 8285518: CDS assert: visibility cannot change between dump time and runtime
• 52dbfa9: 8286460: Remove dependence on JAR filename in CDS tests
• 9073a98: 8282701: Use Class.getInterfaces(false) where possible to reduce allocation pressure
• 0f37736: 8282420: JFR: Remove event handlers
• 04bba07: 8286363: BigInteger.parallelMultiply missing @SInCE 19
• ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/bf0dc4f844ca83855e7fde19313d92da055dcb77...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev Pushed as commit d547a70.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.