Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8253920: Share method trampolines in CDS dynamic archive #868

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

calvinccheung
Copy link
Member

@calvinccheung calvinccheung commented Oct 26, 2020

This patch is to allow sharing of the same method trampoline for archived Methods with the same AdapterHandleEntry when using CDS dynamic archive.

Running javac on HelloWorld with CDS dynamic archive, the number of calls to SharedRuntime::generate_trampoline() is reduced to 406 times vs 12601 times without the patch.

In terms of saving on instructions and time (on linux-x64):
instr delta = -2807662 -0.1369%
time delta = -6.860 ms -1.8798%

It passed tiers 1,2,3,4 testing.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8253920: Share method trampolines in CDS dynamic archive

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/868/head:pull/868
$ git checkout pull/868

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 26, 2020

👋 Welcome back ccheung! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2020

@calvinccheung The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 26, 2020
@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/label remove hotspot

@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/label add hotspot-runtime

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the hotspot hotspot-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 26, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2020

@calvinccheung
The hotspot label was successfully removed.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org label Oct 26, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2020

@calvinccheung
The hotspot-runtime label was successfully added.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung marked this pull request as ready for review October 26, 2020 18:16
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 26, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 26, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Thanks for ensuring static data-structures only used when dumping are lazily allocated.

ResourceObj::C_HEAP> _loaded_unregistered_classes;
ResourceObj::C_HEAP> {};

static LoadedUnregisteredClassesTable* _loaded_unregistered_classes = NULL;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good!

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@cl4es Thanks for your quick review.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 26, 2020

@calvinccheung This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8253920: Share method trampolines in CDS dynamic archive

Reviewed-by: redestad, minqi, iklam

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 20 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7d41a54: 8255450: runtime/ThreadCountLimit.java causes high system load
  • 504cb00: 8252113: Move jfr man page into jfr module
  • 552192f: 8255305: Add Linux x86_32 tier1 to submit workflow
  • 66a3917: 8255331: Problemlist java/foreign/TestMismatch.java on 32-bit platforms until JDK-8254162
  • cf56c7e: 8254980: ZGC: ZHeapIterator visits armed nmethods with -XX:-ClassUnloading
  • 18d9905: 8255342: Remove non-specified JVM checks on Classes with Record attributes
  • 7679650: 8231231: The printing result is different from the case instruction
  • f7c59c6: 8255231: Avoid upcalls when initializing the statSampler
  • dccfd2b: 8255389: ConcurrentHashTable::NoOp omits return in non-void return method
  • d735f91: 8255040: Replace __sync_add_and_fetch with __atomic_add_fetch to avoid build errors with clang
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/83a91bfaed4194064e3a5550b1b25980c9adcb8c...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Oct 26, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@yminqi yminqi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Minor suggestions.

void ArchiveBuilder::update_method_trampolines() {
for (int i = 0; i < klasses()->length(); i++) {
Klass* k = klasses()->at(i);
if (!k->is_instance_klass()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you use
if (k->is_instance_klass()) {
...
}
as same style of line 869

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@yminqi Thanks for your review. I've made the change.

constMethod()->set_adapter_trampoline(cds_adapter->get_adapter_trampoline());
_from_compiled_entry = cds_adapter->get_c2i_entry_trampoline();
assert(_from_compiled_entry != NULL, "sanity");
if (DumpSharedSpaces) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can remove this if check.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I can't remove the check. It doesn't work with the DynamicDumpSharedSpaces case. Note that the conditions of the assert statements are the same as the original code.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I mess up with the two. Then it is OK, thanks for the explain.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I sent Calvin a patch which will allow the if (DumpSharedSpaces) to be removed. The rest of the changes look good to me.

constMethod()->set_adapter_trampoline(cds_adapter->get_adapter_trampoline());
_from_compiled_entry = cds_adapter->get_c2i_entry_trampoline();
assert(_from_compiled_entry != NULL, "sanity");
if (DumpSharedSpaces) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I sent Calvin a patch which will allow the if (DumpSharedSpaces) to be removed. The rest of the changes look good to me.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Oct 27, 2020
@calvinccheung
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 27, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 27, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 27, 2020

@calvinccheung Since your change was applied there have been 20 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7d41a54: 8255450: runtime/ThreadCountLimit.java causes high system load
  • 504cb00: 8252113: Move jfr man page into jfr module
  • 552192f: 8255305: Add Linux x86_32 tier1 to submit workflow
  • 66a3917: 8255331: Problemlist java/foreign/TestMismatch.java on 32-bit platforms until JDK-8254162
  • cf56c7e: 8254980: ZGC: ZHeapIterator visits armed nmethods with -XX:-ClassUnloading
  • 18d9905: 8255342: Remove non-specified JVM checks on Classes with Record attributes
  • 7679650: 8231231: The printing result is different from the case instruction
  • f7c59c6: 8255231: Avoid upcalls when initializing the statSampler
  • dccfd2b: 8255389: ConcurrentHashTable::NoOp omits return in non-void return method
  • d735f91: 8255040: Replace __sync_add_and_fetch with __atomic_add_fetch to avoid build errors with clang
  • ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/compare/83a91bfaed4194064e3a5550b1b25980c9adcb8c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 84e985d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@calvinccheung calvinccheung deleted the 8253920 branch October 27, 2020 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-runtime hotspot-runtime-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
4 participants