New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8286940: [IR Framework] Allow IR tests to build and use Whitebox without -DSkipWhiteBoxInstall=true #8879
Conversation
…out -DSkipWhiteBoxInstall=true
👋 Welcome back chagedorn! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@chhagedorn The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good.
@chhagedorn This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 278 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks Vladimir for your review! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/lib/ir_framework/TestFramework.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Tobias Hartmann <tobias.hartmann@oracle.com>
Thanks Tobias for your review! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit b647a12.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@chhagedorn Pushed as commit b647a12. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Currently, the IR framework always tries to install the Whitebox by moving the Whitebox class file to the JTreg class path. However, when a test already builds the Whitebox and uses it as part of the test, we cannot access it on certain platforms. On Windows, for example, we'll get the following exception:
To mitigate this problem, one can specify
-DSkipWhiteBoxInstall=true
which was already done in JDK-8283187. But this is not a good solution as the user should not need to worry about the inner workings of the IR framework.I propose to get rid of this flag by reworking the Whitebox installation process.
Thanks,
Christian
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8879/head:pull/8879
$ git checkout pull/8879
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/8879
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/8879/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 8879
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 8879
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8879.diff