-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8285081: Improve XPath operators count accuracy #9022
Conversation
👋 Welcome back joehw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@JoeWang-Java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ public abstract class lr_parser { | |||
private int grpCount = 0; | |||
private int opCount = 0; | |||
private int totalOpCount = 0; | |||
private int lastSym; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lastSym
is never initialized. It's OK for the first time, but should this be reset for the next use (if any), e.g. somewhere around line 595?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, -1 would be appropriate as 0 indicates EOF.
public static final int[] OPERATORS = {GT, GE, EQ, NE, LT, LE, SLASH, DSLASH, | ||
DOT, DDOT, ATSIGN, DCOLON, PLUS, MINUS, STAR, DIV, MOD, AND, OR, LPAREN, | ||
LBRACK, VBAR, DOLLAR, NODE, TEXT, PI, PIPARAM}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason for re-shuffling the order of operators? I'd expect new ones are appended to the existing ones, or appear in the order of their declarations above?
(or is this automatically generated, as described in the comment?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The order is not significant for this process as the lexer takes care of creating the right symbol. I re-grouped them to put operators of the same category together so that it's easier to see what might be missing.
@@ -443,6 +473,11 @@ else if (null != targetStrings) | |||
m_processor.m_queueMark = 0; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
private void incrementCount(char c) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
c
is not used.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will remove it.
else if ((Token.LPAREN == c)) | ||
{ | ||
nesting++; | ||
if (!isLiteral) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if (isLiteral) {
might be more readable.
// ',' is part of a function | ||
else if ((Token.LPAREN != c) && (Token.LBRACK != c) && (Token.RPAREN != c) | ||
&& (Token.RBRACK != c) && (Token.COLON != c) && (Token.COMMA != c)) { | ||
if (Token.STAR == c) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be
if (Token.STAR != c || !isAxis) {
incrementCount(c);
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks Naoto! Updated as commented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
@JoeWang-Java This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 61 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 8e07839.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@JoeWang-Java Pushed as commit 8e07839. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Adjust how XPath operators are counted to improve accuracy. This change does not affect how XPath works.
Test:
Tier2 passed;
JCK XML tests passed.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/9022/head:pull/9022
$ git checkout pull/9022
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9022
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/9022/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9022
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9022
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/9022.diff