-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8287805: Shenandoah: consolidate evacuate-update-root closures #9023
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8287805: Shenandoah: consolidate evacuate-update-root closures #9023
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back zgu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@zhengyu123 The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still dislike the fact we are calling Thread::current() on hotpath. I think we can do better. Consider this modification on top of your current PR: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8287805/thread-1.patch -- does that look better?
Are your referring to |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks fine, with minor nits.
|
|
||
| T o = RawAccess<>::oop_load(p); | ||
| if (!CompressedOops::is_null(o)) { | ||
| if (! CompressedOops::is_null(o)) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Redundant whitespace?
| Thread* thr = stable_thread ? _thread : Thread::current(); | ||
| assert(thr == Thread::current(), "Wrong thread"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can move these lines down to the only use in this thread. This would keep Thread::current() out of the hotpath.
|
@zhengyu123 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
|
/integrate |
|
Going to push as commit b2010a7.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@zhengyu123 Pushed as commit b2010a7. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
ShenandoahEvacuateUpdateMetadataClosure and ShenandoahEvacuateUpdateRootsClosure are mostly same, can be consolidated.
Also, only uses of ShenandoahEvacuateUpdateMetadataClosure all pass MO_UNORDERED template parameter, so it can be eliminated.
Test:
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9023/head:pull/9023$ git checkout pull/9023Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9023$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9023/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9023View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9023Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9023.diff