8283724: Incorrect description for jtreg-failure-handler option

[tkiriyama]

The description for the jtreg-failure-handler option is incorrect, so I fixed it to describe jtreg-failure-handler option.
Would you please review this fix?

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8283724: Incorrect description for jtreg-failure-handler option

Reviewers

• Erik Joelsson (@erikj79 - Reviewer)
• Magnus Ihse Bursie (@magicus - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9099/head:pull/9099
$ git checkout pull/9099

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9099
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9099/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9099

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9099

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9099.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back tkiriyama! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@tkiriyama The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• build

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (b1bb2f3f)

[openjdk]

@tkiriyama This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8283724: Incorrect description for jtreg-failure-handler option

Reviewed-by: erikj, ihse

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 36 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 900d967: 8287924: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in EnvHelp.mapToHashtable
• d482d7f: 8286160: (fs) Files.exists returns unexpected results with C:\pagefile.sys because it's not readable
• edff51e: 8284858: Start of release updates for JDK 20
• 2671443: 8286171: HttpClient/2 : Expect:100-Continue blocks indefinitely when response is not 100
• 59b0de6: 8288048: Build failure with GCC 6 after JDK-8286562
• db4405d: 8288078: linux-aarch64-optimized build fails in Tier5 after JDK-8287567
• 7e948f7: 8287903: Reduce runtime of java.math microbenchmarks
• 3fa9984: 8287854: Dangling reference in ClassVerifier::verify_class
• 4285e3d: 8288023: AArch64: disable PAC-RET when preview is enabled
• 560e292: 8287738: [PPC64] jdk/incubator/vector/*VectorTests failing
• ... and 26 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/230726ea58041506157646b6efad0b5c4a012559...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@erikj79, @magicus) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[tkiriyama]

I appreciate all reviews. I hope this change is integrated.

[tkiriyama]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@tkiriyama
Your change (at version b1bb2f3) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[erikj79]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 0901548.
Since your change was applied there have been 38 commits pushed to the master branch:

• dae4c49: 8286197: C2: Optimize MemorySegment shape in int loop
• 94b473e: 8280454: G1: ClassLoaderData verification keeps CLDs live that causes problems with VerifyDuringGC during Remark
• 900d967: 8287924: Avoid redundant HashMap.containsKey call in EnvHelp.mapToHashtable
• d482d7f: 8286160: (fs) Files.exists returns unexpected results with C:\pagefile.sys because it's not readable
• edff51e: 8284858: Start of release updates for JDK 20
• 2671443: 8286171: HttpClient/2 : Expect:100-Continue blocks indefinitely when response is not 100
• 59b0de6: 8288048: Build failure with GCC 6 after JDK-8286562
• db4405d: 8288078: linux-aarch64-optimized build fails in Tier5 after JDK-8287567
• 7e948f7: 8287903: Reduce runtime of java.math microbenchmarks
• 3fa9984: 8287854: Dangling reference in ClassVerifier::verify_class
• ... and 28 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/230726ea58041506157646b6efad0b5c4a012559...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@erikj79 @tkiriyama Pushed as commit 0901548.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.