Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8286259: Password cleanup after KeyStore.PasswordProtection in P11KeyStore #9254

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

haimaychao
Copy link
Contributor

@haimaychao haimaychao commented Jun 23, 2022

Please review the small update for JDK-8286259.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8286259: Password cleanup after KeyStore.PasswordProtection in P11KeyStore

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9254/head:pull/9254
$ git checkout pull/9254

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9254
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9254/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9254

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9254

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9254.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 23, 2022

👋 Welcome back hchao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 23, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@haimaychao The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the security security-dev@openjdk.org label Jun 23, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 23, 2022

Webrevs

} catch (DestroyFailedException dfe) {
// ignore
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This particular change looks fine.
However, I noticed that there is another local PasswordProtection object inside the KeyStoreLoadParameter class in Secmod.java. Is that also subject to the same issue?

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@haimaychao This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8286259: Password cleanup after KeyStore.PasswordProtection in P11KeyStore

Reviewed-by: valeriep

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 64 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e322e77: 8288651: CDS test HelloUnload.java should not use literal string as ClassLoader name
  • 40bf3b1: 8288993: Make AwtFramePackTest generic by removing @requires tag
  • d4b040f: Merge
  • 7e13cdb: 8289079: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1 failed with "RuntimeException: Test failed"
  • 9c92da5: 8247407: tools/jlink/plugins/CompressorPluginTest.java test failing
  • 7ac40f3: 8288983: broken link in com.sun.net.httpserver.SimpleFileServer
  • 20f55ab: 8289044: ARM32: missing LIR_Assembler::cmove metadata type support
  • bdf9902: 8288120: VerifyError with JEP 405 pattern match
  • b0db333: 8288528: broken links in java.desktop
  • 651cbeb: 8288080: (fc) FileChannel::map for MemorySegments should state it always throws UOE
  • ... and 54 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2bf5c9a6877b51377a535c6021a9e38549c89029...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 27, 2022
@haimaychao
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2022

Going to push as commit ca78f7b.
Since your change was applied there have been 64 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • e322e77: 8288651: CDS test HelloUnload.java should not use literal string as ClassLoader name
  • 40bf3b1: 8288993: Make AwtFramePackTest generic by removing @requires tag
  • d4b040f: Merge
  • 7e13cdb: 8289079: java/lang/Thread/jni/AttachCurrentThread/AttachTest.java#id1 failed with "RuntimeException: Test failed"
  • 9c92da5: 8247407: tools/jlink/plugins/CompressorPluginTest.java test failing
  • 7ac40f3: 8288983: broken link in com.sun.net.httpserver.SimpleFileServer
  • 20f55ab: 8289044: ARM32: missing LIR_Assembler::cmove metadata type support
  • bdf9902: 8288120: VerifyError with JEP 405 pattern match
  • b0db333: 8288528: broken links in java.desktop
  • 651cbeb: 8288080: (fc) FileChannel::map for MemorySegments should state it always throws UOE
  • ... and 54 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/2bf5c9a6877b51377a535c6021a9e38549c89029...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 27, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 27, 2022

@haimaychao Pushed as commit ca78f7b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated security security-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants