-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
JDK-8289741 : Remove unused imports from DTDBuilder.java #9360
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JDK-8289741 : Remove unused imports from DTDBuilder.java #9360
Conversation
Some imports are no more used. - java.io.FileNotFoundException; - java.io.BufferedInputStream; - java.io.OutputStream; - java.util.BitSet; - java.util.StringTokenizer; - java.util.Properties; - java.util.zip.DeflaterOutputStream; - java.util.zip.Deflater; - java.net.URL;
|
👋 Welcome back scientificware! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@scientificware The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
|
@scientificware Do you need an entry in the JBS for this PR? |
|
Hi @TheShermanTanker, |
|
Alright, was asking since I can help create one for you, but it seems that others already have it covered |
|
@TheShermanTanker , thank you for asking and helping.
In fact, I don't known. |
Well, in that case, wait no longer! All the best! |
Webrevs
|
|
@TheShermanTanker Thanks. |
|
/label -build |
|
@magicus |
|
@scientificware This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
|
Just waiting to be reviewed. |
|
Hello @scientificware, what you propose here, I think looks fine. Additionally can you also update the copyright years on this file from I see that the changed file resides at |
|
Hello @jaikiran, the copyright years were updated by a previous commit. |
|
You are right, the copyright year on the file is fine - I was looking at an older version of this file. |
|
@jaikiran The build tools are not really part of the build system as such. I used to push for a solution to move them to their corresponding modules, but this met with resistance and did not really go anywhere. In general, though, the build tools needs to be reviewed by the group "owning" them. In some cases, the change affects how the build tool interacts with the rest of the build system. If that is the case, the build label is relevant. Unfortunately, the Skara label rules are a bit too coarse to capture this reality. |
|
Thank you Magnus. Given the nature of this change, adding myself as the reviewer and approving this change. |
|
@scientificware, please issue the integrate command when you are ready and I can sponsor this for you. In the meantime, I'll run some tests to be sure that this change is fine. |
|
@scientificware This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 27 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@jaikiran) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
/integrate |
|
@scientificware |
|
@jaikiran, Done and thanks for your sponsoring and reviewing. |
|
The tests came back fine without any issue. |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 2712bc3.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@jaikiran @scientificware Pushed as commit 2712bc3. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
|
@jaikiran Great Thanks. |
This is tracked in JBS as
JDK-8289741 and duplicated by JDK-8290070
Unused imports in DTDBuider.java.
Some imports are no more used.
scientificware#4
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9360/head:pull/9360$ git checkout pull/9360Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9360$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9360/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9360View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9360Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9360.diff