Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8290269: gc/shenandoah/TestVerifyJCStress.java fails due to invalid tag: required after JDK-8290023 #9485

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DamonFool
Copy link
Member

@DamonFool DamonFool commented Jul 13, 2022

Hi all,

Please review the trivial fix which fixes a typo (required --> requires).

Thanks.
Best regards,
Jie


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290269: gc/shenandoah/TestVerifyJCStress.java fails due to invalid tag: required after JDK-8290023

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9485/head:pull/9485
$ git checkout pull/9485

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9485
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9485/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9485

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9485

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9485.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 13, 2022

👋 Welcome back jiefu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 13, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 13, 2022

@DamonFool The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc
  • shenandoah

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org labels Jul 13, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 13, 2022

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@tschatzl tschatzl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm and trivial

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2022

@DamonFool This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290269: gc/shenandoah/TestVerifyJCStress.java fails due to invalid tag: required after JDK-8290023

Reviewed-by: tschatzl

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 14 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • adf40d2: 8290149: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails on Windows Server 2019/2022
  • 292d909: 8290178: failure_handler: run netstat without name lookups
  • a7f8358: Merge
  • ce36f6e: 8290203: ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/capability/CM03/cm03t001/TestDescription.java on linux-all
  • fff7f35: 8290201: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/InvokeHangTest.java on macosx-x64 in vthread mode
  • 128c6c6: 8290095: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/largeMemory/LargeGatheringWrite.java timed out
  • 59d0c73: 8289930: Improve Thread description of inherited AccessControlContext
  • 4545ed6: 8289365: SegmentAllocator:allocateArray(MemoryLayout, count) does not throw IAEx when count is -1
  • 0fd1b68: 8290071: Javadoc for MemorySegment/MemoryAddress getter/setters contains some typos
  • 2baf526: 8288850: SegmentAllocator:allocate() can return null some cases
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3216d198f382e991522600086bb2691abfe5f067...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 14, 2022
@tschatzl
Copy link
Contributor

Also, apologies for the issue - I did not do release build runs with the change, and gha doesn't either.

@DamonFool
Copy link
Member Author

Lgtm and trivial

Thanks @tschatzl for the review.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2022

Going to push as commit be58cbc.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 109e21a: 8290080: G1: Remove unnecessary is-obj-dead check in HeapRegion::do_oops_on_memregion_in_humongous
  • adf40d2: 8290149: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails on Windows Server 2019/2022
  • 292d909: 8290178: failure_handler: run netstat without name lookups
  • a7f8358: Merge
  • ce36f6e: 8290203: ProblemList vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/scenarios/capability/CM03/cm03t001/TestDescription.java on linux-all
  • fff7f35: 8290201: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/InvokeHangTest.java on macosx-x64 in vthread mode
  • 128c6c6: 8290095: java/nio/channels/FileChannel/largeMemory/LargeGatheringWrite.java timed out
  • 59d0c73: 8289930: Improve Thread description of inherited AccessControlContext
  • 4545ed6: 8289365: SegmentAllocator:allocateArray(MemoryLayout, count) does not throw IAEx when count is -1
  • 0fd1b68: 8290071: Javadoc for MemorySegment/MemoryAddress getter/setters contains some typos
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3216d198f382e991522600086bb2691abfe5f067...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 14, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 14, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 14, 2022

@DamonFool Pushed as commit be58cbc.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@DamonFool DamonFool deleted the JDK-8290269 branch July 14, 2022 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-gc hotspot-gc-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated shenandoah shenandoah-dev@openjdk.org
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants