Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8290504: Close streams returned by ModuleReader::list #9557

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

rjernst
Copy link
Contributor

@rjernst rjernst commented Jul 19, 2022

This commit ensures streams returned by ModuleReader::list are closed.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290504: Close streams returned by ModuleReader::list

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9557/head:pull/9557
$ git checkout pull/9557

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9557
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9557/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9557

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9557

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9557.diff

This commit ensures streams returned by ModuleReader::list are closed.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 19, 2022

👋 Welcome back rjernst! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jul 19, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 19, 2022

@rjernst The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org label Jul 19, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Webrevs

@rjernst
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjernst commented Jul 19, 2022

Note that ModulePatcher::list delegates to ModuleReader::list, but since the stream it builds closes the underlying stream, the use doesn't need to be closed within the list method.

Copy link
Member

@mlchung mlchung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 20, 2022

@rjernst This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290504: Close streams returned by ModuleReader::list

Reviewed-by: mchung, chegar

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 15f4b30: 8290115: ArrayCopyObject JMH has wrong package
  • 4c1cd66: 8288368: simplify code in ValueTaglet, remove redundant code
  • 6346c33: 8290826: validate-source failures after JDK-8290016
  • 604a115: 8290016: IGV: Fix graph panning when mouse dragged outside of window
  • 59e495e: 8290704: x86: TemplateTable::_new should not call eden_allocate() without contiguous allocs enabled

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@mlchung, @jaikiran, @ChrisHegarty) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jul 20, 2022
Copy link
Member

@jaikiran jaikiran left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello Ryan, the failures reported in the GitHub Actions jobs look related to this change. One such failure is in CallerSensitiveAccess test which throws an exception as follows:

java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.IllegalStateException: source already consumed or closed
	at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethodNoCheckedException(MethodInvocationHelper.java:49)
	at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeDataProvider(MethodInvocationHelper.java:145)
	at org.testng.internal.Parameters.handleParameters(Parameters.java:797)
	at org.testng.internal.Parameters.handleParameters(Parameters.java:740)
	at org.testng.internal.ParameterHandler.handleParameters(ParameterHandler.java:59)
	at org.testng.internal.ParameterHandler.createParameters(ParameterHandler.java:38)
	at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker$MethodInvocationAgent.invoke(TestInvoker.java:789)
	at org.testng.internal.TestInvoker.invokeTestMethods(TestInvoker.java:147)
	at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:146)
	at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:128)
	at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1511)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:764)
	at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:585)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:384)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:378)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:337)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:286)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:53)
	at org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:96)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1218)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1140)
	at org.testng.TestNG.runSuites(TestNG.java:1069)
	at org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1037)
	at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.TestNGRunner.main(TestNGRunner.java:94)
	at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.TestNGRunner.main(TestNGRunner.java:54)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
	at com.sun.javatest.regtest.agent.MainWrapper$MainThread.run(MainWrapper.java:127)
	at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1589)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: source already consumed or closed
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.sourceSpliterator(AbstractPipeline.java:409)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluateToArrayNode(AbstractPipeline.java:260)
	at java.base/java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.toArray(ReferencePipeline.java:616)
	at CallerSensitiveAccess.callerSensitiveMethods(CallerSensitiveAccess.java:67)
	at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DirectMethodHandleAccessor.invoke(DirectMethodHandleAccessor.java:104)
	at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:578)
	at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:132)
	at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:76)
	at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethodNoCheckedException(MethodInvocationHelper.java:45)
	... 28 more

return reader.list()
try (ModuleReader reader = mref.open();
Stream<String> stream = reader.list()) {
return stream
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change is causing the test to fail, in the callerSensitiveMethods DataProvider, because the data provider is expecting an open stream to be returned by callerSensitiveMethods(Module) - the stream is now closed.

There are a couple of ways to resolve this, but the most straightforward would be to revert this part of the change, and have the callerSensitiveMethods DataProvider close the returned stream. E.g.:

  @DataProvider(name = "callerSensitiveMethods")
  static Object[][] callerSensitiveMethods() {
      try (var methodStream = callerSensitiveMethods(Object.class.getModule())) {
          return methodStream
                  .map(m -> new Object[]{m, shortDescription(m)})
                  .toArray(Object[][]::new);
      }
  }

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, this would solve it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done in 4a94c64

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rjernst it seems that the revert part of the above has been done, but not the "have the callerSensitiveMethods DataProvider close the returned stream".

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry I misunderstood. Fixed now in 3080378.

@@ -114,9 +115,9 @@ private static byte[] computeHash(ModuleReader reader, String algorithm) {
} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(e);
}
try {
try (Stream<String> stream = reader.list()){
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
try (Stream<String> stream = reader.list()){
try (Stream<String> stream = reader.list()) {

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

@rjernst this pull request can not be integrated into master due to one or more merge conflicts. To resolve these merge conflicts and update this pull request you can run the following commands in the local repository for your personal fork:

git checkout try_files/module_reader_uses
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push

@openjdk openjdk bot added merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated merge-conflict Pull request has merge conflict with target branch labels Jul 21, 2022
Copy link
Member

@ChrisHegarty ChrisHegarty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@rjernst
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjernst commented Jul 21, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

@rjernst
Your change (at version 5d09188) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@ChrisHegarty
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

Going to push as commit 80bd8c3.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 15f4b30: 8290115: ArrayCopyObject JMH has wrong package
  • 4c1cd66: 8288368: simplify code in ValueTaglet, remove redundant code
  • 6346c33: 8290826: validate-source failures after JDK-8290016
  • 604a115: 8290016: IGV: Fix graph panning when mouse dragged outside of window
  • 59e495e: 8290704: x86: TemplateTable::_new should not call eden_allocate() without contiguous allocs enabled

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

@ChrisHegarty @rjernst Pushed as commit 80bd8c3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs core-libs-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants