-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8290731: Clean up CDS handling of LambdaForm Species classes #9577
8290731: Clean up CDS handling of LambdaForm Species classes #9577
Conversation
👋 Welcome back iklam! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
/label remove hotspot |
@iklam |
@iklam |
Webrevs
|
@@ -28,9 +28,15 @@ | |||
|
|||
public class CDSLambdaInvoker { | |||
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable { | |||
// The following calls trigger the generation of new Species classes | |||
// that are not included in the base archive (or the default modules image. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Extra open parenthesis?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. One small nit.
@iklam This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 72 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thanks @calvinccheung for the review. |
Going to push as commit 66f59c2.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please see the JBS issue for the reasons for this small clean up.
The main change is in
LambdaFormInvokers::regenerate_holder_classes()
-- do not regenerate the Species_XXX classes. However, mark them as "generated" to be compatible with JVMTI.I renamed
Klass::is_regenerated()
toKlass::is_generated_shared_class()
for clarity.I also updated the test case to be clear what it's trying to do -- Species_IL should be loaded from base archive and Species_JL should be loaded from the dynamic archive.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9577/head:pull/9577
$ git checkout pull/9577
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9577
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9577/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9577
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9577
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9577.diff