New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292158: AES-CTR cipher state corruption with AVX-512 #9635
Conversation
|
@AJ-Ferguson The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please, add regression test.
Hi @AJ-Ferguson, please note that the JBS issue is assigned to @smita-kamath, who wrote the original implementation. Please check with Smita or other regular Intel contributors (e.g. @jatin-bhateja, @sviswa7) before moving forward with this changeset. |
@AJ-Ferguson, will take a look at the PR. Thank you. |
@AJ-Ferguson This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
Hi @AJ-Ferguson, I have modified the changes you recommended and added a suggestion. Please have a look at the diff file and let me know what you think. Thanks. |
Co-authored-by: smita-kamath <smita.kamath@intel.com>
Hello @smita-kamath, thank you for taking the time to look at this PR. The changes you posted look good to me. I have added your improvements and updated the branch. |
@AJ-Ferguson Please do add a test for this case. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good. I submitted testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Testing passed.
@AJ-Ferguson This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 54 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@vnkozlov, @sviswa7) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me as well.
Thank you for the reviews. /integrate |
@AJ-Ferguson |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 9d76ac8.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@sviswa7 @AJ-Ferguson Pushed as commit 9d76ac8. |
Fix cipher state corruption when encrypting/decrypting less than 16 bytes at a time.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9635/head:pull/9635
$ git checkout pull/9635
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9635
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9635/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9635
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9635
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9635.diff