-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.2k
8292068: Convert ModuleEntryTable into ResourceHashtable #9809
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
| class ModuleEntryTableDeleter : public StackObj { | ||
| public: | ||
| bool do_entry(const Symbol*& name, ModuleEntry*& entry) { | ||
| ResourceMark rm; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The ResourceMark should be used inside log_is_enabled(...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this usage is ugly but I'll add it because of the as_C_string() is used only if logging.
|
Thanks Ioi for reviewing this! I fixed the code for your comments and am rerunning tier1-3 in case of other missing Module_locks. I already ran jfr tests since there are places where jfr iterates through modules. |
lfoltan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good Coleen!
Thanks,
Lois
|
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
iklam
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
…le_table. This should be fixed separately.
|
I had to revert the modules_do asserts and locks because of JDK-8292202. |
|
Thanks Ioi and Lois. |
|
Thanks for the reviews, Ioi and Lois. GHA happy. |
|
Going to push as commit b47438c.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Converted the ModuleEntryTable to use ResourceHashtable.
Ran tiers 1-7. Also ran performance tests with this and other changes with no performance difference, although the footprint of this should be better.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9809/head:pull/9809$ git checkout pull/9809Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9809$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9809/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9809View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9809Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9809.diff