-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8292559: Add test for -XX:+CheckJNICalls showing changed signal handlers #9919
Conversation
👋 Welcome back hseigel! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for this test.
void sig_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *info, ucontext_t *context) { | ||
|
||
printf( " HANDLER (1) " ); | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: handler could be file scope static, and does not need extern "C"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
@hseigel This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 17 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Glad the test is revived.
Thanks Thomas and Coleen for suggesting adding this test and reviewing this PR! |
Still good. |
/label -build |
@magicus |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit 37aa7c1.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
Please review this small change to add a test that option -XX:+CheckJNICalls shows changed signal handlers. This new test is a copy of the recently deleted TestPosixSig.java with small changes. This version of the test only checks that handlers were changed for SIGFPE and SIGILL signals.
The test was tested using Mach5 to run it on Linux, Mac OS, and Windows.
Thanks, Harold
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9919/head:pull/9919
$ git checkout pull/9919
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/9919
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/9919/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 9919
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 9919
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/9919.diff