8273655: content-types.properties files are missing some common types

[gnu-andrew]

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit 65ed0a74 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Julia Boes on 21 Sep 2021 and was reviewed by Brian Burkhalter and Daniel Fuchs.

This is a clean update of the OpenJDK mime types which has already been backported to 17u. The risk of extending the list of recognised types is low and will enable OpenJDK to correctly identify more file types.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8273655: content-types.properties files are missing some common types

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/1007/head:pull/1007
$ git checkout pull/1007

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1007
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/1007/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1007

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1007

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/1007.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back andrew! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@gnu-andrew This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8273655: content-types.properties files are missing some common types

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (c04c5738)

[gnu-andrew]

Bug now has jdk11u-fix-yes

[gnu-andrew]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit b6f59f5.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

• b9d0a03: 8283350: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2022a

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@gnu-andrew Pushed as commit b6f59f5.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

[DamonFool]

Hi @gnu-andrew ,
java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails due to record is not supported by JDK11.

[GoeLin]

Hi @gnu-andrew, our CI shows this, too.

[DamonFool]

Hi @gnu-andrew, our CI shows this, too.

Hi @GoeLin , shall we problemlist the test ?

[GoeLin]

I opened JDK-8285720 [11u 13u 15u] test/jdk/java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java fails after backport of 8273655

[gnu-andrew]

Why was this not picked up by pre-submit testing? Are we not running enough tests in GHA?

[mlbridge]

Mailing list message from Lindenmaier, Goetz on jdk-updates-dev:

Hi,

It is a jdk tier2 test.
I guess we can not run all tests in GHA.

Best regards,
Goetz

[gnu-andrew]

Ok, I just wondered why it was missed. The SKARA backport command makes things so easy, I guess I forgot to do due diligence.
I'll try and get a fix for this proposed today.

[gnu-andrew]

Finally submitted #1111