8222799: java.beans.Introspector uses an obsolete methods cache

[basil]

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of JDK-8222799 (openjdk/jdk@921b46738e0).

The only merge conflicts in Introspector.java were copyrights and imports, which were trivially fixed.

The commit being backported was authored by @mrserb on October 20, 2020, and was reviewed by prr.

See #1103 (review) for the motivation for this backport; namely, it would be cleaner to backport this first in order to then be able to backport JDK-8231454 without conflicts.

Thanks!

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 reviewer)

Issue

• JDK-8222799: java.beans.Introspector uses an obsolete methods cache

Reviewers

• Martin Doerr (@TheRealMDoerr - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/1106/head:pull/1106
$ git checkout pull/1106

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1106
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/1106/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1106

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1106

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/1106.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back basil! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (11652aa1)

[basil]

I do not have JBS access. Can someone please submit the following comment with the jdk11u-fix-request label:

It would be cleaner to backport this first in order to then be able to backport JDK-8231454 without conflicts. I tested this PR as part of testing the backport of JDK-8231454.

[TheRealMDoerr]

Almost clean. LGTM. I've added the request and the label to the JBS issue.

[openjdk]

@basil This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8222799: java.beans.Introspector uses an obsolete methods cache

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• d71a543: 8287119: Add Distrust.java to ProblemList

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@TheRealMDoerr) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[basil]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@basil
Your change (at version 11652aa) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[TheRealMDoerr]

Problems in Pre-submit tests on Windows were observed without this PR, too.
/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 69bdf9b.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

• d71a543: 8287119: Add Distrust.java to ProblemList

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@TheRealMDoerr @basil Pushed as commit 69bdf9b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.