8270184: [TESTBUG] Add coverage for jvmci ResolvedJavaType.toJavaName() for lambdas

[jerboaa]

This backport has the regression test for #120. It fails without that patch and passes after. I intend to integrate those two together. Patch didn't apply clean due to differences in the same code location, but the patch itself is the same as for JDK 18.

---

Progress

• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

• JDK-8270184: [TESTBUG] Add coverage for jvmci ResolvedJavaType.toJavaName() for lambdas

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/123/head:pull/123
$ git checkout pull/123

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/123
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/123/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 123

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 123

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/123.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back sgehwolf! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8270184: [TESTBUG] Add coverage for jvmci ResolvedJavaType.toJavaName() for lambdas

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 09c6af3: 8249899: jdk/javadoc/tool/InlineTagsWithBraces.java uses @ignore w/o bug-id
• 22a4752: 8268360: Missing check for infinite loop during node placement

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (bea48552)

[jerboaa]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 23918db.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• d4e4828: 8270196: [11u] [JVMCI] JavaType.toJavaName() returns incorrect type name for lambdas
• 8d1e402: 8265132: C2 compilation fails with assert "missing precedence edge"
• cbd3b0f: 8267399: C2: java/text/Normalizer/ConformanceTest.java test failed with assertion
• 09c6af3: 8249899: jdk/javadoc/tool/InlineTagsWithBraces.java uses @ignore w/o bug-id
• 22a4752: 8268360: Missing check for infinite loop during node placement

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@jerboaa Pushed as commit 23918db.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.