Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8288360: CI: ciInstanceKlass::implementor() is not consistent for well-known classes #1238

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jul 18, 2022

I backport this for parity with 11.0.17-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8288360: CI: ciInstanceKlass::implementor() is not consistent for well-known classes

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1238/head:pull/1238
$ git checkout pull/1238

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1238
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1238/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1238

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1238

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1238.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jul 18, 2022

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 50f99c3208fc9f479cc109fb6e73d262e27026a2 8288360: CI: ciInstanceKlass::implementor() is not consistent for well-known classes Jul 18, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 18, 2022

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8288360: CI: ciInstanceKlass::implementor() is not consistent for well-known classes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 18, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jul 18, 2022

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Jul 21, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

Going to push as commit 517a18e.
Since your change was applied there have been 28 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9d8e388: 8208471: nsk/jdb/unwatch/unwatch002/unwatch002.java fails with "Prompt is not received during 300200 milliseconds"
  • 11eed37: 8266774: System property values for stdout/err on Windows UTF-8
  • 77d9210: 8289486: Improve XSLT XPath operators count efficiency
  • d3a4879: 8281738: Create a regression test for checking the 'Space' key activation of focused Button
  • a240a9e: 8281988: Create a regression test for JDK-4618767
  • ac3893c: 8281745: Create a regression test for JDK-4514331
  • a0edf35: 8281535: Create a regression test for JDK-4670051
  • defa4f8: 8265531: doc/building.md should mention homebrew install freetype
  • 1f40289: 8288865: [aarch64] LDR instructions must use legitimized addresses
  • c1e2cf6: 8284758: [linux] improve print_container_info
  • ... and 18 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/4b456463029f98d8434a2071eecaf33cab25d396...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jul 21, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jul 21, 2022

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 517a18e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant