Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1 #1383

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Oct 3, 2022

I backport this for parity with 11.0.18-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1383/head:pull/1383
$ git checkout pull/1383

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1383
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1383/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1383

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1383

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1383.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 3, 2022

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport afa5d4ced38b7f3752932c28af96d8fc600d1df7 8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1 Oct 3, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 3, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 3, 2022

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8290451: Incorrect result when switching to C2 OSR compilation from C1

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 3, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 3, 2022

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Oct 5, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2022

Going to push as commit 905baaf.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 49b85e8: 8291459: JVM crash with GenerateOopMap::error_work(char const*, __va_list_tag*)
  • fba01e8: 8290705: StringConcat::validate_mem_flow asserts with "unexpected user: StoreI"
  • 0f84f99: 8282276: Problem list failing two Robot Screen Capture tests
  • fb9a279: 8290781: Segfault at PhaseIdealLoop::clone_loop_handle_data_uses
  • 66d4be3: 8288985: P11TlsKeyMaterialGenerator should work with ChaCha20-Poly1305
  • ca33f6c: 8293578: Duplicate ldc generated by javac

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Oct 5, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 5, 2022

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 905baaf.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant