Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8210373: Deadlock in libj2gss.so when loading "j2gss" and "net" libraries in parallel. #1627

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jan 3, 2023

I backport this for parity with 11.0.19-oracle.

Resolved Copyright, will mark as clean.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8210373: Deadlock in libj2gss.so when loading "j2gss" and "net" libraries in parallel.

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1627/head:pull/1627
$ git checkout pull/1627

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1627
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev pull/1627/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1627

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1627

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1627.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 3, 2023

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 991f7c1303998b090cdc25f87b253afaf7302ec6 8210373: Deadlock in libj2gss.so when loading "j2gss" and "net" libraries in parallel. Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 3, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 3, 2023

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Jan 3, 2023

/clean

@openjdk openjdk bot added the clean label Jan 3, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@GoeLin This backport pull request is now marked as clean

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 3, 2023

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8210373: Deadlock in libj2gss.so when loading "j2gss" and "net" libraries in parallel.

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 62191cd: 8221621: FindTests.gmk cannot handle "=" in TEST.groups comments

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 3, 2023
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Jan 4, 2023

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 4, 2023

Going to push as commit d2c8326.
Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • 62191cd: 8221621: FindTests.gmk cannot handle "=" in TEST.groups comments

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 4, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 4, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 4, 2023

@GoeLin Pushed as commit d2c8326.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8210373 branch January 4, 2023 10:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant