-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8299234: JMX Repository.query performance #1762
Conversation
👋 Welcome back abakhtin! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lgtm, but note that this is a performance oriented backport into a legacy JDK of a commit that has not seen production use.
@alexeybakhtin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 53 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Thank you a lot for review |
@alexeybakhtin This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
@alexeybakhtin This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the |
Almost clean backport of JDK-8299234 to JDK11u
The only difference is the format of the removed ObjectNamePattern class declaration:
private final static class ObjectNamePattern
vsprivate static final class ObjectNamePattern
Performance of the original code:
Benchmark (N) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
JmxBenchmark.queryMBeansForMyObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 78.090 ± 0.206 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryMBeansForObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 144.837 ± 0.618 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryNamesForMyObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 77.323 ± 1.159 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryNamesForObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 144.938 ± 3.588 ops/s
Performance after patch applied:
Benchmark (N) Mode Cnt Score Error Units
JmxBenchmark.queryMBeansForMyObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 108.009 ± 9.615 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryMBeansForObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 233.958 ± 12.616 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryNamesForMyObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 108.239 ± 10.117 ops/s
JmxBenchmark.queryNamesForObjectName 1000 thrpt 10 258.043 ± 5.981 ops/s
javax/naming and javax/management tests passed
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/1762/head:pull/1762
$ git checkout pull/1762
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1762
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/1762/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1762
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1762
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1762.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment