Skip to content

Conversation

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented May 8, 2023

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of JDK-8282467, commit 2903d59a from the openjdk/jdk17u-dev repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Goetz Lindenmaier on 8 Jun 2022 and had no reviewers.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/1869/head:pull/1869
$ git checkout pull/1869

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/1869
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/1869/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 1869

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 1869

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/1869.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented May 8, 2023

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 2903d59a90c66481fd57dacb3341f3f3315f5be3 8282467: add extra diagnostics for JDK-8268184 May 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels May 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 8, 2023

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8282467: add extra diagnostics for JDK-8268184

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1f49004: 8248701: On Windows generated modules-deps.gmk can contain backslash-r (CR) characters
  • 7b2d5fc: 8257856: Make ClassFileVersionsTest.java robust to JDK version updates
  • 6a28ccb: 8276880: Remove java/lang/RuntimeTests/exec/ExecWithDir as unnecessary
  • 4548929: 8303476: Add the runtime version in the release file of a JDK image
  • 1f601e9: 8303861: Error handling step timeouts should never be blocked by OnError and others

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels May 8, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented May 8, 2023

Webrevs

Should fix build errors in linuxppc64le crossbuild
@openjdk openjdk bot removed clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels May 10, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the cast to int is ok as workaround for wrong gcc warnings in GHA. (fegetround is specified to return an int, so, the cast is basically a nop.)

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label May 10, 2023
@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 11, 2023

Going to push as commit 9317eec.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 12093c0: 8303576: addIdentitiesToKeystore in KeystoreImpl.m needs CFRelease call in early potential CHECK_NULL return
  • f5da5da: 8303354: addCertificatesToKeystore in KeystoreImpl.m needs CFRelease call in early potential CHECK_NULL return
  • 804ed83: 8305682: Update the javadoc in the Character class to state support for GB 18030-2022 Implementation Level 2
  • 75c5063: 8301401: Allow additional characters for GB18030-2022 support
  • 63cb8a1: 8301998: Update HarfBuzz to 7.0.1
  • d8f1a34: 8296934: Write a test to verify whether Undecorated Frame can be iconified or not
  • 7e93c80: 8292206: TestCgroupMetrics.java fails as getMemoryUsage() is lower than expected
  • 521833e: 8282077: PKCS11 provider C_sign() impl should handle CKR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL error
  • 2995d08: 8209880: tzdb.dat is not reproducibly built
  • 1f49004: 8248701: On Windows generated modules-deps.gmk can contain backslash-r (CR) characters
  • ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/8c243a33b290f5e747ee227f005d30260e6d846f...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label May 11, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this May 11, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels May 11, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented May 11, 2023

@RealCLanger Pushed as commit 9317eec.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants