Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8238930: problem list compiler/c2/ #190

wants to merge 1 commit into from


Copy link

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented Aug 4, 2021

Please review the backport of this test exclusion (JDK-8238930). I see the test compiler/c2/ regularly failing in the GitHub Actions pipeline and the actual issue JDK-8235801 doesn't seem to be fixed yet.


  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue


  • JDK-8238930: problem list compiler/c2/


Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch pull/190/head:pull/190
$ git checkout pull/190

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/190
$ git pull pull/190/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 190

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 190

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:

Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 4, 2021

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 93241e5db71cf6db00db4cc513f127fe5b1885e0 8238930: problem list compiler/c2/ Aug 4, 2021
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 4, 2021

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8238930: problem list compiler/c2/

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Aug 4, 2021
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Aug 4, 2021


Copy link
Contributor Author

@RealCLanger RealCLanger commented Aug 5, 2021


Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

Going to push as commit 5464d62.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1c77fa8: 8254270: linux 32 bit build doesn't compile libjdwp/log_messages.c
  • 52a32a7: 8269851: OperatingSystemMXBean getProcessCpuLoad reports incorrect process cpu usage in containers
  • 1223b58: 8212040: Compilation error due to wrong usage of NSPrintJobDispositionValue in mac10.12
  • b878e3f: 8263432: javac may report an invalid package/class clash on case insensitive filesystems
  • f2240cc: 8221988: add possibility to build with Visual Studio 2019
  • 87e300b: 8220445: Support for side by side MSVC Toolset versions
  • d05effd: 8270893: IndexOutOfBoundsException while reading large TIFF file
  • d900e31: 8211055: Provide print to a file (PDF) feature even when printer was not connected

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Aug 5, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Aug 5, 2021
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Aug 5, 2021

@RealCLanger Pushed as commit 5464d62.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@RealCLanger RealCLanger deleted the 8238930 branch Aug 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
backport clean integrated
2 participants