Skip to content

8211045: [Testbug] Fix for 8144279 didn't define a test case! #2259

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member

@SoniaZaldana SoniaZaldana commented Nov 6, 2023

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit bc6fb26d from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by David Holmes on 24 Sep 2018 and was reviewed by Aleksey Shipilev and Severin Gehwolf.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8211045 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8211045: [Testbug] Fix for 8144279 didn't define a test case! (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2259/head:pull/2259
$ git checkout pull/2259

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2259
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2259/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2259

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2259

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2259.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back szaldana! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport bc6fb26d02791f1f8ed9d60a0535d2066dbb3601 8211045: [Testbug] Fix for 8144279 didn't define a test case! Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue and summary from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Nov 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 6, 2023

⚠️ @SoniaZaldana This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 6, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Nov 7, 2023
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Nov 8, 2023

/approve yes

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2023

@GoeLin
8211045: The approval request has been approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2023

@SoniaZaldana This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8211045: [Testbug] Fix for 8144279 didn't define a test case!

Add missing file from original commit

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 13 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 34cc089: 8298905: Test "java/awt/print/PrinterJob/ImagePrinting/PrintARGBImage.java" fails because the frames of instruction does not display
  • b773f56: 6445283: ProgressMonitorInputStream not large file aware (>2GB)
  • 799a7c8: 8292683: Remove BadKeyUsageTest.java from Problem List
  • 0bc8b22: 8230858: Replace wildcard address with loopback or local host in tests - part 23
  • 3592b70: 8317373: Add Telia Root CA v2
  • 75daf18: 8315214: Do not run sun/tools/jhsdb tests concurrently
  • 662f3bd: 8317920: JDWP-agent sends broken exception event with onthrow option
  • 68807aa: 8314242: Update applications/scimark/Scimark.java to accept VM flags
  • 5754eb1: 8290469: Add new positioning options to PassFailJFrame test framework
  • 2aca53f: 8026393: jarsigner never shows a warning in badKeyUsage case
  • ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/b64a1acb212a64629094bf7e992d98500f91d629...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Nov 8, 2023
@SoniaZaldana
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Nov 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2023

@SoniaZaldana
Your change (at version 4f2c79a) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Nov 9, 2023

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

Going to push as commit 8f7589f.
Since your change was applied there have been 16 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2bbab16: 8185531: [TESTBUG] Improve test configuration for shared strings
  • c54521b: 8314263: Signed jars triggering Logger finder recursion and StackOverflowError
  • 416c48e: 8310265: (process) jspawnhelper should not use argv[0]
  • 34cc089: 8298905: Test "java/awt/print/PrinterJob/ImagePrinting/PrintARGBImage.java" fails because the frames of instruction does not display
  • b773f56: 6445283: ProgressMonitorInputStream not large file aware (>2GB)
  • 799a7c8: 8292683: Remove BadKeyUsageTest.java from Problem List
  • 0bc8b22: 8230858: Replace wildcard address with loopback or local host in tests - part 23
  • 3592b70: 8317373: Add Telia Root CA v2
  • 75daf18: 8315214: Do not run sun/tools/jhsdb tests concurrently
  • 662f3bd: 8317920: JDWP-agent sends broken exception event with onthrow option
  • ... and 6 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/b64a1acb212a64629094bf7e992d98500f91d629...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Nov 9, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 9, 2023

@GoeLin @SoniaZaldana Pushed as commit 8f7589f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants