8249812: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with SocketTimeoutException

[luchenlin]

I backport this for parity with 11.0.22-oracle.
Also backport for JDK-8232513. Clean backports.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• JDK-8232513 needs maintainer approval
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• JDK-8249812 needs maintainer approval
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issues

• JDK-8249812: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with SocketTimeoutException (Bug - P4 - Approved)
• JDK-8232513: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with BindException (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Lutz Schmidt (@RealLucy - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2285/head:pull/2285
$ git checkout pull/2285

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2285
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2285/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2285

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2285

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2285.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back andrewlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue and summary from the original commit.

[luchenlin]

/issue add JDK-8232513

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (70999416)

[openjdk]

@luchenlin
Adding additional issue to issue list: 8232513: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with BindException.

[luchenlin]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@luchenlin This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

[RealLucy]

Did you verify the test runs successfully?

[luchenlin]

Did you verify the test runs successfully?

yes, local test pass.

[RealLucy]

Changes look good to me.
Once nightly tests have passed feel free to integrate.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @luchenlin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[openjdk]

@luchenlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8249812: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with SocketTimeoutException
8232513: java/net/DatagramSocket/PortUnreachable.java still fails intermittently with BindException

Fixed the test to reenable its retry logic

Reviewed-by: lucy

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2420592: 8312126: NullPointerException in CertStore.getCRLs after 8297955
• a72d0b2: 8240754: Instrument FlowTest.java to provide more debug traces.
• fca62cf: 8289077: Add manual tests to open
• 250d7a8: 8214694: cleanup rawtypes warnings in open jndi tests
• fac5955: 8238740: java/net/httpclient/whitebox/FlowTestDriver.java should not specify a TLS protocol
• f2488a3: 8317374: Add Let's Encrypt ISRG Root X2
• 7814102: 8244508: JFR: FlightRecorderOptions reset date format
• 10ddd51: 8275329: ZGC: vmTestbase/gc/gctests/SoftReference/soft004/soft004.java fails with assert(_phases->length() <= 1000) failed: Too many recored phases?
• 45e3cbf: 8294427: Check boxes and radio buttons have rendering issues on Windows in High DPI env

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealLucy) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[luchenlin]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@luchenlin
Your change (at version 7099941) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[GoeLin]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 911c359.
Since your change was applied there have been 14 commits pushed to the master branch:

• bd7420a: 8224035: Replace wildcard address with loopback or local host in tests - part 9
• f9bedac: 8218178: vmTestbase/vm/mlvm/mixed/stress/regression/b6969574/INDIFY_Test.java fails with -Xcomp
• 345122d: 8067250: [mlvm] vm/mlvm/mixed/stress/regression/b6969574 fails and perf regression
• 1f4decf: 8318759: Add four DigiCert root certificates
• 6321d3e: 8316746: Top of lock-stack does not match the unlocked object
• 2420592: 8312126: NullPointerException in CertStore.getCRLs after 8297955
• a72d0b2: 8240754: Instrument FlowTest.java to provide more debug traces.
• fca62cf: 8289077: Add manual tests to open
• 250d7a8: 8214694: cleanup rawtypes warnings in open jndi tests
• fac5955: 8238740: java/net/httpclient/whitebox/FlowTestDriver.java should not specify a TLS protocol
• ... and 4 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/046b213712ea32b17a289c546c9719a99bb2ff6c...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@GoeLin @luchenlin Pushed as commit 911c359.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.