Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8217475: Unexpected StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread #2341

Closed

Conversation

luchenlin
Copy link
Contributor

@luchenlin luchenlin commented Dec 6, 2023

I backport this for parity with 11.0.23-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8217475 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8217475: Unexpected StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2341/head:pull/2341
$ git checkout pull/2341

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2341
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2341/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2341

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2341

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2341.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 6, 2023

👋 Welcome back andrewlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a376fb77201701e73b540713b4ce067c7c9e8642 8217475: Unexpected StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread Dec 6, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 6, 2023

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 6, 2023

⚠️ @luchenlin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 6, 2023
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 6, 2023

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Dec 7, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 7, 2023

@luchenlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8217475: Unexpected StackOverflowError in "process reaper" thread

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 23 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • c0575b8: 8237777: "Dumping core ..." is shown despite claiming that "# No core dump will be written."
  • 8191f62: 8316030: Update Libpng to 1.6.40
  • db1d944: 8281149: (fs) java/nio/file/FileStore/Basic.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: values differ by more than 1GB
  • 2d7dd47: 8207214: Broken links in JDK API serialized-form page
  • e4504a4: Merge
  • 09b402a: 8319187: Add three eMudhra emSign roots
  • e793bdd: 8234309: LFGarbageCollectedTest.java fails with parse Exception
  • 082fb9c: 8219612: [TESTBUG] compiler.codecache.stress.Helper.TestCaseImpl can't be defined in different runtime package as its nest host
  • 3b2d165: 8186610: move ModuleUtils to top-level testlibrary
  • 1080258: 8218754: JDK-8068225 regression in JDIBreakpointTest
  • ... and 13 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/360bab8a084b2c7b76af47245dd036c2c2c761c7...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Dec 7, 2023
@luchenlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Going to push as commit e63499d.
Since your change was applied there have been 29 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3ea286a: 8313081: MonitoringSupport_lock should be unconditionally initialized after 8304074
  • 31064b1: 8304074: [JMX] Add an approximation of total bytes allocated on the Java heap by the JVM
  • 8a390c8: 8281717: Cover logout method for several LoginModule
  • a9536ae: 8226905: unproblem list applications/ctw/modules/* tests on windows
  • c77e538: 8251904: vmTestbase/nsk/sysdict/vm/stress/btree/btree010/btree010.java fails with ClassNotFoundException: nsk.sysdict.share.BTree0LLRLRLRRLR
  • 050bbdb: 8225471: Test utility jdk.test.lib.util.FileUtils.areAllMountPointsAccessible needs to tolerate duplicates
  • c0575b8: 8237777: "Dumping core ..." is shown despite claiming that "# No core dump will be written."
  • 8191f62: 8316030: Update Libpng to 1.6.40
  • db1d944: 8281149: (fs) java/nio/file/FileStore/Basic.java fails with java.lang.RuntimeException: values differ by more than 1GB
  • 2d7dd47: 8207214: Broken links in JDK API serialized-form page
  • ... and 19 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/360bab8a084b2c7b76af47245dd036c2c2c761c7...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 8, 2023
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 8, 2023
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 8, 2023

@luchenlin Pushed as commit e63499d.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant