8322725: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2023d

[lutkerd]

Clean backport of tadata2023d.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue
• JDK-8322725 needs maintainer approval

Issue

• JDK-8322725: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2023d (Enhancement - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

• Aleksey Shipilev (@shipilev - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2435/head:pull/2435
$ git checkout pull/2435

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2435
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2435/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2435

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2435

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2435.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back dlutker! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (f4645438)

[shipilev]

Apparently same deal as with 17u-dev backport. This is apparently the automatic /backport, but it is not marked clean, because the paths are different. Bots seemed to have auto-detected the moves correctly, and then correctly implicitly asked for reviews. Good bots.

I checked the change against the mainline commit (openjdk/jdk@2a9c358) and previous commit to jdk11u (openjdk/jdk11u@7f30a6c), and I think this is a correct thing to do.

[openjdk]

⚠️ @lutkerd This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

[lutkerd]

/approval request backport of tzdata2023d. Local tests pass

[openjdk]

@lutkerd
8322725: The approval request has been created successfully.

[openjdk]

@lutkerd This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8322725: (tz) Update Timezone Data to 2023d

Reviewed-by: shade

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 666bf87: 8321215: Incorrect x86 instruction encoding for VSIB addressing mode
• c759b2e: 8309119: [17u/11u] Redo JDK-8297951: C2: Create skeleton predicates for all If nodes in loop predication
• c342a03: 8313643: Update HarfBuzz to 8.2.2
• 3c732a6: 8281377: Remove vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/ThreadMXBean/ThreadInfo/Deadlock/JavaDeadlock001/TestDescription.java from problemlist.
• de6ccb9: 8294402: Add diagnostic logging to VMProps.checkDockerSupport
• f6ddc4b: 8296083: javax/swing/JTree/6263446/bug6263446.java fails intermittently on a VM
• 94bf6db: 8202790: DnD test DisposeFrameOnDragTest.java does not clean up
• 8ca3b77: 8322417: Console read line with zero out should zero out when throwing exception
• 4031a88: 8239801: [macos] java/awt/Focus/UnaccessibleChoice/AccessibleChoiceTest.java fails
• 9a16bee: 8310551: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/interrupt/interrupt001/interrupt001.java timed out due to missing prompt
• ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/e3b6c5085ca37e581ebd0ddcd4c4de41eb348cb1...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@shipilev) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

[lutkerd]

/integrate

[openjdk]

@lutkerd
Your change (at version f464543) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

[shipilev]

/sponsor

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 58b154e.
Since your change was applied there have been 11 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 666bf87: 8321215: Incorrect x86 instruction encoding for VSIB addressing mode
• c759b2e: 8309119: [17u/11u] Redo JDK-8297951: C2: Create skeleton predicates for all If nodes in loop predication
• c342a03: 8313643: Update HarfBuzz to 8.2.2
• 3c732a6: 8281377: Remove vmTestbase/nsk/monitoring/ThreadMXBean/ThreadInfo/Deadlock/JavaDeadlock001/TestDescription.java from problemlist.
• de6ccb9: 8294402: Add diagnostic logging to VMProps.checkDockerSupport
• f6ddc4b: 8296083: javax/swing/JTree/6263446/bug6263446.java fails intermittently on a VM
• 94bf6db: 8202790: DnD test DisposeFrameOnDragTest.java does not clean up
• 8ca3b77: 8322417: Console read line with zero out should zero out when throwing exception
• 4031a88: 8239801: [macos] java/awt/Focus/UnaccessibleChoice/AccessibleChoiceTest.java fails
• 9a16bee: 8310551: vmTestbase/nsk/jdb/interrupt/interrupt001/interrupt001.java timed out due to missing prompt
• ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/e3b6c5085ca37e581ebd0ddcd4c4de41eb348cb1...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@shipilev @lutkerd Pushed as commit 58b154e.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.