Skip to content

8322883: [BACKOUT] 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries#2450

Closed
GoeLin wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
GoeLin:goetz_backport_8322883
Closed

8322883: [BACKOUT] 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries#2450
GoeLin wants to merge 2 commits intoopenjdk:masterfrom
GoeLin:goetz_backport_8322883

Conversation

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Jan 10, 2024

This is a backout needed as the change is too intrusive for a backport.
Backport of the 17 change.

This is not clean because in 11

  • an extra import was needed
  • a """ string was adapted to 11 syntax

The backout was crafted with two git revert commands.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • JDK-8322883 needs maintainer approval
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8322883: [BACKOUT] 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries (Bug - P3 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2450/head:pull/2450
$ git checkout pull/2450

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2450
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2450/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2450

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2450

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2450.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

…eturn type of a constructor"

This reverts commit 02df756.
…ross compilation boundaries"

This reverts commit bd5ef73.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 10, 2024

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport ea6fc2147182f5b7168dc6f4e240c49446bf2ca3 8322883: [BACKOUT] 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries Jan 10, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 10, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 10, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 10, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@TheRealMDoerr TheRealMDoerr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 12, 2024

⚠️ @GoeLin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Jan 15, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2024

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8322883: [BACKOUT] 8225377: type annotations are not visible to javac plugins across compilation boundaries

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8aa5509: 8307381: Open Source JFrame, JIF related Swing Tests
  • 3bb03ee: 8306871: Open source more AWT Drag & Drop tests
  • 7262e7d: 8280007: Enable Neoverse N1 optimizations for Arm Neoverse V1 & N2
  • e7f17f1: 8306076: Open source AWT misc tests
  • e55aac2: 8259801: Enable XML Signature secure validation mode by default

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received labels Jan 15, 2024
@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Jan 16, 2024

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Going to push as commit ff6e6d7.
Since your change was applied there have been 6 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 1f3c7d5: 8309462: [AIX] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RunAgentThread/agentthr001/TestDescription.java crashing due to empty while loop
  • 8aa5509: 8307381: Open Source JFrame, JIF related Swing Tests
  • 3bb03ee: 8306871: Open source more AWT Drag & Drop tests
  • 7262e7d: 8280007: Enable Neoverse N1 optimizations for Arm Neoverse V1 & N2
  • e7f17f1: 8306076: Open source AWT misc tests
  • e55aac2: 8259801: Enable XML Signature secure validation mode by default

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 16, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 16, 2024
@GoeLin GoeLin deleted the goetz_backport_8322883 branch January 16, 2024 09:03
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 16, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 16, 2024

@GoeLin Pushed as commit ff6e6d7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments