Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8306640: Open source several AWT TextArea related tests #2527

Closed

Conversation

luchenlin
Copy link
Contributor

@luchenlin luchenlin commented Feb 19, 2024

I backport this for JDK-8306640.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8306640 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8306640: Open source several AWT TextArea related tests (Bug - P4 - Approved)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2527/head:pull/2527
$ git checkout pull/2527

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2527
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2527/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2527

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2527

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2527.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back andrewlu! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 169a7c27a7c6521fbfb1e61fbe85e6d7b0470619 8306640: Open source several AWT TextArea related tests Feb 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 19, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 19, 2024

⚠️ @luchenlin This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Feb 19, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 19, 2024

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Feb 21, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 21, 2024

@luchenlin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8306640: Open source several AWT TextArea related tests

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • de3ae6f: 8318468: compiler/tiered/LevelTransitionTest.java fails with -XX:CompileThreshold=100 -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1
  • 38a60d7: 8318983: Fix comment typo in PKCS12Passwd.java
  • cc88c3c: 8317307: test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapPoolTimeoutTest.java fails with ConnectException: Connection timed out: no further information
  • ccd4c98: 8319668: Fixup of jar filename typo in BadFactoryTest.sh
  • a5e6577: 8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch
  • 92cb5eb: 8319456: jdk/jfr/event/gc/collection/TestGCCauseWith[Serial|Parallel].java : GC cause 'GCLocker Initiated GC' not in the valid causes
  • ddc3e41: 8318736: com/sun/jdi/JdwpOnThrowTest.java failed with "transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use"
  • 6ecf198: 8316001: GC: Make TestArrayAllocatorMallocLimit use createTestJvm
  • f7cd14c: 8307123: Fix deprecation warnings in DPrinter

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Feb 21, 2024
@luchenlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Going to push as commit aeb6381.
Since your change was applied there have been 12 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 9724132: 8306752: Open source several container and component AWT tests
  • c905214: 8306755: Open source few Swing JComponent and AbstractButton tests
  • 382942d: 8326109: GCC 13 reports maybe-uninitialized warnings for jni.cpp with dtrace enabled
  • de3ae6f: 8318468: compiler/tiered/LevelTransitionTest.java fails with -XX:CompileThreshold=100 -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1
  • 38a60d7: 8318983: Fix comment typo in PKCS12Passwd.java
  • cc88c3c: 8317307: test/jdk/com/sun/jndi/ldap/LdapPoolTimeoutTest.java fails with ConnectException: Connection timed out: no further information
  • ccd4c98: 8319668: Fixup of jar filename typo in BadFactoryTest.sh
  • a5e6577: 8315680: java/lang/ref/ReachabilityFenceTest.java should run with -Xbatch
  • 92cb5eb: 8319456: jdk/jfr/event/gc/collection/TestGCCauseWith[Serial|Parallel].java : GC cause 'GCLocker Initiated GC' not in the valid causes
  • ddc3e41: 8318736: com/sun/jdi/JdwpOnThrowTest.java failed with "transport error 202: bind failed: Address already in use"
  • ... and 2 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/compare/8af22e796a5cc7ea8eabf5e687447c083942d646...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 22, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 22, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 22, 2024

@luchenlin Pushed as commit aeb6381.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant