-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space #2704
8326201: [S390] Need to bailout cleanly if creation of stubs fails when code cache is out of space #2704
Conversation
👋 Welcome back amitkumar! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@offamitkumar This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 4 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@RealLucy) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
I performed build tier1 test on fastdebug-vm. Didn't see any new failure appearing. @RealLucy would you please review this, This time we will end backporting saga for this issue ;-) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
|
/approval request fixes the port in jdk11. Test result on s390x looks clean. No other platform is affected & risk is low. |
@offamitkumar |
thank you @RealLucy for the review :-) /integrate |
@offamitkumar |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 42f7042.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealLucy @offamitkumar Pushed as commit 42f7042. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of commit d5f3d5c8 from the openjdk/jdk repository.
The commit being backported was authored by Amit Kumar on 21 Feb 2024 and was reviewed by Lutz Schmidt and Martin Doerr.
Thanks!
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2704/head:pull/2704
$ git checkout pull/2704
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2704
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2704/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2704
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2704
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2704.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment