-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 232
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8293887: AArch64 build failure with GCC 12 due to maybe-uninitialized warning in libfdlibm k_rem_pio2.c #2709
Conversation
Signed-off-by: sendaoYan <yansendao.ysd@alibaba-inc.com>
👋 Welcome back syan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@sendaoYan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 11 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@theRealAph, @phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks.
|
/approval request Backport of JDK-8293887, disable gcc compiler maybe-uninitialized warning for k_rem_pio2.c. The change has been verified. The risk is low. |
@sendaoYan |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clean backport from 17u, net of file location change.
Thanks all for the review and approved. |
@sendaoYan would you mind to integrate this today to have it in 11.0.24? |
Sorry, I didn't notice that the /integrate |
@sendaoYan |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 8a489e5.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealCLanger @sendaoYan Pushed as commit 8a489e5. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Thanks. |
Hi all,
This is backport of JDK-8293887. It's not clean backport, because the file
make/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
has been moved tomake/modules/java.base/lib/CoreLibraries.gmk
Thanks!
Make test list:
make-linux-aarch64-gcc10.log
make-linux-aarch64-gcc13.log
make-linux-x64-gcc10.log
make-linux-x64-gcc13.log
make-linux-riscv64-gcc13.log
linux riscv64 gcc13 build jdk11u-dev failure because other reasons, the
k_rem_pio2.c
file not longer compile fail after this PR.Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2709/head:pull/2709
$ git checkout pull/2709
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2709
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2709/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2709
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2709
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2709.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment