Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test #2922

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

cost0much
Copy link
Contributor

@cost0much cost0much commented Aug 26, 2024

Clean backport that improves DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test; already backported to 17 and 21. Passes affected test in Linux x64.
MacOS GHA failing due to unrelated deprecated code during compile


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • JDK-8303920 needs maintainer approval
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test (Enhancement - P4 - Approved)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2922/head:pull/2922
$ git checkout pull/2922

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2922
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2922/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2922

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2922

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2922.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Aug 26, 2024

👋 Welcome back cost0much! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2024

@cost0much This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test

Reviewed-by: andrew

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 48 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@gnu-andrew) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 79349b8bb30e3a358a1fec2382d44aabcf15239b 8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test Aug 26, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2024

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@cost0much
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request Improves the test DataDescriptorSignatureMissing added in JDK22. Applies cleanly. Affected test passes. Risk is low: the change is test code only.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 26, 2024

@cost0much
8303920: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Aug 26, 2024
@cost0much cost0much marked this pull request as ready for review August 26, 2024 21:01
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Aug 26, 2024
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Aug 26, 2024

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member

GoeLin commented Aug 27, 2024

There are failed tests.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 27, 2024

⚠️ @cost0much This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the approval label Aug 27, 2024
@phohensee
Copy link
Member

MacOS GHA build failures are sprintf related, i.e., unrelated to this backport.

@cost0much
Copy link
Contributor Author

/approval request Improves the test DataDescriptorSignatureMissing added in JDK22. Applies cleanly. Affected test passes and failing GHA is unrelated to the backport. Risk is low: the change is test code only.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Aug 27, 2024

@cost0much
8303920: The approval request has been updated successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval label Aug 27, 2024
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 24, 2024

@cost0much This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 22, 2024

@cost0much This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Oct 22, 2024
@cost0much
Copy link
Contributor Author

/open

@openjdk openjdk bot reopened this Nov 8, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@cost0much This pull request is now open

@cost0much
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 8, 2024

@cost0much This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

Maintainer(s), the JBS is tagged jdk11u-fix-yes, but the bot doesn't appear to have noticed. How can we fix it?

Copy link
Member

@gnu-andrew gnu-andrew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed clean and updated test passes.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed approval labels Nov 12, 2024
@cost0much
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@cost0much
Your change (at version 9a2b472) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Going to push as commit 513a67a.
Since your change was applied there have been 48 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored labels Nov 12, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2024

@phohensee @cost0much Pushed as commit 513a67a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@cost0much cost0much deleted the JDK-8303920 branch November 12, 2024 22:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants