-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8303920: Avoid calling out to python in DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test #2922
Conversation
👋 Welcome back cost0much! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@cost0much This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 48 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@gnu-andrew) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
/approval request Improves the test DataDescriptorSignatureMissing added in JDK22. Applies cleanly. Affected test passes. Risk is low: the change is test code only. |
@cost0much |
There are failed tests. |
|
MacOS GHA build failures are sprintf related, i.e., unrelated to this backport. |
/approval request Improves the test DataDescriptorSignatureMissing added in JDK22. Applies cleanly. Affected test passes and failing GHA is unrelated to the backport. Risk is low: the change is test code only. |
@cost0much |
@cost0much This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration! |
@cost0much This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the |
/open |
@cost0much This pull request is now open |
/integrate |
@cost0much This pull request has not yet been marked as ready for integration. |
Maintainer(s), the JBS is tagged jdk11u-fix-yes, but the bot doesn't appear to have noticed. How can we fix it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed clean and updated test passes.
/integrate |
@cost0much |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit 513a67a.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@phohensee @cost0much Pushed as commit 513a67a. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Clean backport that improves DataDescriptorSignatureMissing test; already backported to 17 and 21. Passes affected test in Linux x64.
MacOS GHA failing due to unrelated deprecated code during compile
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2922/head:pull/2922
$ git checkout pull/2922
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2922
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/2922/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2922
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2922
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/2922.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment