Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched #43

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dchuyko
Copy link
Member

@dchuyko dchuyko commented Jun 18, 2021

This is a follow-up to #41
Original patch applies cleanly on master.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/43/head:pull/43
$ git checkout pull/43

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/43
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/43/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 43

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 43

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/43.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 18, 2021

👋 Welcome back dchuyko! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport df792573e8f6f7dff8f39469b0edaaa8f03715ce 8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched Jun 18, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Jun 18, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Jun 18, 2021

@dchuyko This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8255274: [PPC64, s390] wrong StringLatin1.indexOf version matched

Reviewed-by: phh

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 482 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 25c33bc: 8239422: [TESTBUG] compiler/c1/TestPrintIRDuringConstruction.java failed when C1 is disabled
  • 00255bd: 8263068: Rename safefetch.hpp to safefetch.inline.hpp
  • 1297c26: 8275051: Shenandoah: Correct ordering of requested gc cause and gc request flag
  • 4b6e487: 8197800: Test java/awt/Focus/NonFocusableWindowTest/NoEventsTest.java fails on Windows
  • 5a2b2ac: 8198619: java/awt/Focus/FocusTraversalPolicy/ButtonGroupLayoutTraversal/ButtonGroupLayoutTraversalTest.java fails on mac
  • b449303: 8171998: javax/swing/JMenu/4692443/bug4692443.java fails on Windows
  • cdc48c2: 8256201: java/awt/FullScreen/FullscreenWindowProps/FullscreenWindowProps.java failed
  • 93e98ad: 8266579: Update test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessHandle/PermissionTest.java & test/jdk/java/sql/testng/util/TestPolicy.java
  • 1772cf1: 8272708: [Test]: Cleanup: test/jdk/security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/BuypassCA.java no longer needs ocspEnabled
  • 0f9d6bf: 8247510: typo in IllegalHandshakeMessage
  • ... and 472 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/compare/0605504ec99448158590d0d7d7c54416ca95460f...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@phohensee) but any other Committer may sponsor as well.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Jun 18, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Jun 18, 2021

Webrevs

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 13, 2021

@dchuyko This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply add a new comment to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 20, 2021

@dchuyko This pull request has been inactive for more than 8 weeks and will now be automatically closed. If you would like to continue working on this pull request in the future, feel free to reopen it! This can be done using the /open pull request command.

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot closed this Nov 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean ready rfr
2 participants