Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8208074: [TESTBUG] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefineWithoutBytecodeCorruption/TestDescription.java failed with NullPointerException #684

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

GoeLin
Copy link
Member

@GoeLin GoeLin commented Dec 6, 2021

I backport this for parity with 11.0.15-oracle.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8208074: [TESTBUG] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefineWithoutBytecodeCorruption/TestDescription.java failed with NullPointerException

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/684/head:pull/684
$ git checkout pull/684

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/684
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/684/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 684

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 684

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/684.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 6, 2021

👋 Welcome back goetz! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 16f9e07ba160b61cf0da17b30ab50e0d237b6eea 8208074: [TESTBUG] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefineWithoutBytecodeCorruption/TestDescription.java failed with NullPointerException Dec 6, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 6, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue and summary from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 6, 2021

@GoeLin This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8208074: [TESTBUG] vmTestbase/nsk/jvmti/RedefineClasses/StressRedefineWithoutBytecodeCorruption/TestDescription.java failed with NullPointerException

Fixed refactoring caused by JDK-8203820

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready rfr labels Dec 6, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 6, 2021

Webrevs

@GoeLin
Copy link
Member Author

GoeLin commented Dec 7, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 7, 2021

Going to push as commit 38bfb43.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 3a452af: 8266168: -Wmaybe-uninitialized happens in check_code.c
  • c82d66c: 8266174: -Wmisleading-indentation happens in libmlib_image sources
  • f8ed0fe: 8251558: J2DBench should support shaped and translucent windows

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 7, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Dec 7, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 7, 2021

@GoeLin Pushed as commit 38bfb43.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated
1 participant