Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8265335: Epsilon: Minor typo in EpsilonElasticTLABDecay description #69

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shipilev
Copy link
Member

@shipilev shipilev commented Jun 25, 2021

Unclean backport (although bots think it is clean when fuzzed apply?), since the flags infrastructure changed a bit in later JDKs. Passes gc/epsilon tests.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8265335: Epsilon: Minor typo in EpsilonElasticTLABDecay description

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/69/head:pull/69
$ git checkout pull/69

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/69
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/69/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 69

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 69

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/69.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 25, 2021

👋 Welcome back shade! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 17b6592d8ff7f58f4885a8a1e313250797a7124d 8265335: Epsilon: Minor typo in EpsilonElasticTLABDecay description Jun 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 25, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 25, 2021

@shipilev This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8265335: Epsilon: Minor typo in EpsilonElasticTLABDecay description

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 2c2cc74: 8261496: Shenandoah: reconsider pacing updates memory ordering
  • a092a17: 8266813: Shenandoah: Use shorter instruction sequence for checking if marking in progress
  • 80a72de: 8266018: Shenandoah: fix an incorrect assert
  • a0958a8: 8210959: JShell fails and exits when statement throws an exception whose message contains a '%'.
  • 66d4ee9: 8247421: [TESTBUG] ReturnBlobToWrongHeapTest.java failed allocating blob

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 25, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 25, 2021

Webrevs

@shipilev
Copy link
Member Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2021

Going to push as commit b74d798.
Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5a7e7d3: 8265761: Font with missed font family name is not properly printed on Windows
  • f56d1f6: 8266480: Implicit null check optimization does not update control of hoisted memory operation
  • 2c2cc74: 8261496: Shenandoah: reconsider pacing updates memory ordering
  • a092a17: 8266813: Shenandoah: Use shorter instruction sequence for checking if marking in progress
  • 80a72de: 8266018: Shenandoah: fix an incorrect assert
  • a0958a8: 8210959: JShell fails and exits when statement throws an exception whose message contains a '%'.
  • 66d4ee9: 8247421: [TESTBUG] ReturnBlobToWrongHeapTest.java failed allocating blob

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 28, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 28, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 28, 2021

@shipilev Pushed as commit b74d798.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@shipilev shipilev deleted the JDK-8265335 branch July 2, 2021 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant