Skip to content

Conversation

@VladimirKempik
Copy link

@VladimirKempik VladimirKempik commented Mar 16, 2022

Clean backport to jdk11u-dev


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8280476: [macOS] : hotspot arm64 bug exposed by latest clang

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/897/head:pull/897
$ git checkout pull/897

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/897
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev pull/897/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 897

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 897

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u-dev/pull/897.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Mar 16, 2022

👋 Welcome back vkempik! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport f5d6fddc6df8c5c5456a2544b131833d5227292b 8280476: [macOS] : hotspot arm64 bug exposed by latest clang Mar 16, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 16, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Mar 16, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 16, 2022

@VladimirKempik This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8280476: [macOS] : hotspot arm64 bug exposed by latest clang

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 16, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Mar 16, 2022

Webrevs

@VladimirKempik
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2022

Going to push as commit b42dd74.
Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 73dc222: 8257794: Zero: assert(istate->_stack_limit == istate->_thread->last_Java_sp() + 1) failed: wrong on Linux/x86_32
  • 6135540: 8223396: [TESTBUG] several jfr tests do not clean up files created in /tmp
  • 9543488: 8247592: refactor test/jdk/tools/launcher/Test7029048.java
  • 62afe2e: 8166727: javac crashed: [jimage.dll+0x1942] ImageStrings::find+0x28
  • e1b2f92: 8279356: Method linking fails with guarantee(mh->adapter() != NULL) failed: Adapter blob must already exist!
  • 38e44eb: 8199874: [TESTBUG] runtime/Thread/ThreadPriorities.java fails with "expected 0 to equal 10"
  • ebf6a5b: 8207364: nsk/jvmti/ResourceExhausted/resexhausted003 fails to start

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Mar 17, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Mar 17, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Mar 17, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Mar 17, 2022

@VladimirKempik Pushed as commit b42dd74.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant