8286594: (zipfs) Mention paths with dot elements in ZipException and cleanups

[RealCLanger]

The backport needed some resolving/adaptation to older zipfs code.
Method IndexNode:toString is not implemented, so this part of the upstream patch does not apply.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8286594: (zipfs) Mention paths with dot elements in ZipException and cleanups

Reviewers

• Martin Doerr (@TheRealMDoerr - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u pull/38/head:pull/38
$ git checkout pull/38

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/38
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u pull/38/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 38

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 38

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk11u/pull/38.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (21d59e88)

[TheRealMDoerr]

Ok, the hunk is omitted, because JDK-8222276 and JDK-8213031 are not in 11u.
I noticed that you are also backporting JDK-8286444 and JDK-8286855.
Makes sense.

[openjdk]

@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8286594: (zipfs) Mention paths with dot elements in ZipException and cleanups

Reviewed-by: mdoerr

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 4546db6: 8240132: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/InvokeHangTest.java
• 06ead4e: 8274171: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java failed on "Content type" mismatches

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[RealCLanger]

GHA failures on Windows are unrelated, Will be fixed with #39

[RealCLanger]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 9c64a06.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3f9d731: 8286444: javac errors after JDK-8251329 are not helpful enough to find root cause
• 54a1784: 8287378: GHA: Update cygwin to fix issues in langtools tests on Windows
• 3625ce7: 8287739: [11u] ProblemList sun/security/ssl/SSLSessionImpl/NoInvalidateSocketException.java
• 4546db6: 8240132: ProblemList com/sun/jdi/InvokeHangTest.java
• 06ead4e: 8274171: java/nio/file/Files/probeContentType/Basic.java failed on "Content type" mismatches

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@RealCLanger Pushed as commit 9c64a06.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.