-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 192
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8303465: KeyStore of type KeychainStore, provider Apple does not show all trusted certificates #73
8303465: KeyStore of type KeychainStore, provider Apple does not show all trusted certificates #73
Conversation
👋 Welcome back clanger! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
@RealCLanger This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
JBS approval received /integrate |
Going to push as commit d286dde.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@RealCLanger Pushed as commit d286dde. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
This pull request contains a backport of JDK-8303465, commit ac41c030 from the openjdk/jdk repository.
This is an improvement for the handling of certificates from the MacOSX keychain which regressed since the April 2022 CPU update (11.0.15) and does not show all appropriate certificates that it should do. The fix was just recently submitted in head and came too late for the regular dev cycle for 11.0.20. However, I would ask to include it now in rampdown, since we have an open customer issue that it would solve. Since our customer is consuming the JDK via Eclipse/Adoptium, it would also not suffice to cherry-pick it into the SapMachine build only, so that's why my request is to take it into 11.0.20.
The backport applied nearly clean, I only had to adapt some Java code due to lacking instanceof features in 11.
It involves a CSR but the original CSR has been approved for all relevant backport releases.
Thanks
Christoph
Progress
Issues
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u.git pull/73/head:pull/73
$ git checkout pull/73
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/73
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u.git pull/73/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 73
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 73
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u/pull/73.diff
Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment