Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8247502: PhaseStringOpts crashes while optimising effectively dead code #189

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@omikhaltsova
Copy link
Contributor

@omikhaltsova omikhaltsova commented Apr 23, 2021

I'd like to backport JDK-8247502 to jdk13u for parity with jdk11u.
The original patch applied cleanly.
Tested with tier1, tier2. No regression in tests.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8247502: PhaseStringOpts crashes while optimising effectively dead code

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk13u-dev pull/189/head:pull/189
$ git checkout pull/189

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/189
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk13u-dev pull/189/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 189

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 189

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk13u-dev/pull/189.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 23, 2021

👋 Welcome back omikhaltcova! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport a14490dd161b9ac9b4f900489fd84e756ff6e740 8247502: PhaseStringOpts crashes while optimising effectively dead code Apr 23, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2021

@omikhaltsova This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8247502: PhaseStringOpts crashes while optimising effectively dead code

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready label Apr 23, 2021
@omikhaltsova omikhaltsova marked this pull request as ready for review Apr 23, 2021
@omikhaltsova
Copy link
Contributor Author

@omikhaltsova omikhaltsova commented Apr 23, 2021

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 23, 2021

@omikhaltsova
Your change (at version 01b0e45) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Apr 23, 2021

Webrevs

@yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator

@yan-too yan-too commented Apr 26, 2021

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Apr 26, 2021

@yan-too @omikhaltsova Pushed as commit d61430b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@omikhaltsova omikhaltsova deleted the omikhaltsova:backport-a14490dd branch May 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants