Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8249183: JVM crash in "AwtFrame::WmSize" method #35

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator

@yan-too yan-too commented Nov 27, 2020

should be downported to 13u as well. Patch applies clean, relevant tests do pass


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk13u-dev pull/35/head:pull/35
$ git checkout pull/35

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

@bridgekeeper bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 27, 2020

👋 Welcome back yan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 4e3d9e394438ab4cc1c303973c54b1604d0d5f0c 8249183: JVM crash in "AwtFrame::WmSize" method Nov 27, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Nov 27, 2020

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Nov 27, 2020

@yan-too This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8249183: JVM crash in "AwtFrame::WmSize" method

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 7 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5af784b: 8233954: UnsatisfiedLinkError or NoSuchAlgorithmException after removing sunec.dll
  • 89354b8: 8226575: OperatingSystemMXBean should be made container aware
  • 92da5d8: 8243489: Thread CPU Load event may contain wrong data for CPU time under certain conditions
  • 91b19c9: 8230767: FlightRecorderListener returns null recording
  • 85a31ac: 8227006: [linux] Runtime.availableProcessors execution time increased by factor of 100
  • 170d1a6: 8213535: Windows HiDPI html lightweight tooltips are truncated
  • e9fdf00: 8210977: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestThreadLocalLeak.java fails to find ThreadLocalObject

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@yan-too yan-too commented Nov 27, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 27, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated and removed ready rfr labels Nov 27, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

@openjdk openjdk bot commented Nov 27, 2020

@yan-too Since your change was applied there have been 7 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 5af784b: 8233954: UnsatisfiedLinkError or NoSuchAlgorithmException after removing sunec.dll
  • 89354b8: 8226575: OperatingSystemMXBean should be made container aware
  • 92da5d8: 8243489: Thread CPU Load event may contain wrong data for CPU time under certain conditions
  • 91b19c9: 8230767: FlightRecorderListener returns null recording
  • 85a31ac: 8227006: [linux] Runtime.availableProcessors execution time increased by factor of 100
  • 170d1a6: 8213535: Windows HiDPI html lightweight tooltips are truncated
  • e9fdf00: 8210977: jdk/jfr/event/oldobject/TestThreadLocalLeak.java fails to find ThreadLocalObject

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit 80be64a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mlbridge
Copy link

@mlbridge mlbridge bot commented Nov 27, 2020

Webrevs

@yan-too yan-too deleted the bp8249183 branch Nov 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
1 participant