8275703: System.loadLibrary fails on Big Sur for libraries hidden from filesystem

[omikhaltsova]

I'd like to backport JDK-8275703 to jdk13u for parity with jdk11u. The same issue is observed here.
The original patch needs a lot of changes because of the code reworking in jdk15u by "8228336: Refactor native library loading implementation". This patch is identical to those one applied to jdk11u.
The issue was reproduced and verified locally on macOS Monterey 12.0.1 according to the guideline described in the bug. After applying this patch the issue was eliminated.
Tested with tier1 (macOS x64, Linux x64, Windows x64).

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8275703: System.loadLibrary fails on Big Sur for libraries hidden from filesystem

Reviewers

• Vladimir Kempik (@VladimirKempik - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk13u-dev pull/358/head:pull/358
$ git checkout pull/358

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/358
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk13u-dev pull/358/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 358

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 358

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk13u-dev/pull/358.diff

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back omikhaltcova! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (4c07308b)

[openjdk]

@omikhaltsova This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8275703: System.loadLibrary fails on Big Sur for libraries hidden from filesystem

Reviewed-by: vkempik

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 5 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5179e68: 8238386: (sctp) jdk.sctp/unix/native/libsctp/SctpNet.c "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• e381ff8: 8238388: libj2gss/NativeFunc.o "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• 6ff23d4: 8233941: Generated Pipeline_Use_Cycle_Mask::operator= interferes with memcpy updates
• 16e304d: 8238380: java.base/unix/native/libjava/childproc.c "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• 7f77820: 8250863: Build error with GCC 10 in NetworkInterface.c and k_standard.c

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[omikhaltsova]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 0370988.
Since your change was applied there have been 5 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 5179e68: 8238386: (sctp) jdk.sctp/unix/native/libsctp/SctpNet.c "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• e381ff8: 8238388: libj2gss/NativeFunc.o "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• 6ff23d4: 8233941: Generated Pipeline_Use_Cycle_Mask::operator= interferes with memcpy updates
• 16e304d: 8238380: java.base/unix/native/libjava/childproc.c "multiple definition" link errors with GCC10
• 7f77820: 8250863: Build error with GCC 10 in NetworkInterface.c and k_standard.c

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@omikhaltsova Pushed as commit 0370988.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.