Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

8250902: Implement MD5 Intrinsics on x86 #163

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

phohensee
Copy link
Member

@phohensee phohensee commented Jan 27, 2022

I'd like to backport MD5 intrinsification because it improves security related performance. Backport is clean except for a merge conflict in library_call.cpp resulting from renumbering the intrinsic enum.

This backport will be immediately followed by a backport of JDK-8251260 to fix two tests. After that, I'd like to backport the aarch64 version in JDK-8251216.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev pull/163/head:pull/163
$ git checkout pull/163

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/163
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev pull/163/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 163

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 163

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev/pull/163.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 27, 2022

👋 Welcome back phh! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 339016a0f2cbbbbc3560e50c6726e14afbf547f6 8250902: Implement MD5 Intrinsics on x86 Jan 27, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 27, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 27, 2022
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 27, 2022

Webrevs

@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you for the review, Ludovic.

Testing: tier1, including the new and existing sha tests.

@simonis
Copy link
Member

simonis commented Jan 28, 2022

Looks good to me.

Just for reference, I want to mention that the merge conflict in library_call.cpp is because 8151779: Some intrinsic flags could be replaced with one general flag is missing in JDK 15, but it obviously doesn't make sense to downport that huge change as a dependency for this downport.

Thanks,
Volker

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@phohensee This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8250902: Implement MD5 Intrinsics on x86

Reviewed-by: luhenry, simonis

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 28, 2022
@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review, Volker. I agree on 8151779.

@phohensee
Copy link
Member Author

Backport approved.

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2022

Going to push as commit 6a904b3.
Since your change was applied there have been 2 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • feac56e: 8275082: Update XML Security for Java to 2.3.0
  • e95ff4d: 8280414: Memory leak in DefaultProxySelector

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jan 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 31, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 31, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 31, 2022

@phohensee Pushed as commit 6a904b3.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@phohensee phohensee deleted the backport-339016a0 branch January 31, 2022 21:07
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport integrated Pull request has been integrated
3 participants