Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
/ jdk15u-dev Public archive

8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily #172

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator

@yan-too yan-too commented Feb 9, 2022

clean backport; new and old tests do pass.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev pull/172/head:pull/172
$ git checkout pull/172

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/172
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev pull/172/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 172

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 172

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk15u-dev/pull/172.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Feb 9, 2022

👋 Welcome back yan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 8822d41fdcc2c2d568badd72635dc587d21dbd63 8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily Feb 9, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2022

@yan-too This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8274736: Concurrent read/close of SSLSockets causes SSLSessions to be invalidated unnecessarily

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8612163: 8281374: Add MD5.implCompress0 to Graal toBeInvestigated list after 8280978
  • 7b8073a: 8278381: [GCC 11] Address::make_raw() does not initialize rspec
  • 6ea7ef6: 8280373: Update Xalan serializer / SystemIDResolver to align with JDK-8270492

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 9, 2022
@yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yan-too commented Feb 9, 2022

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2022

Going to push as commit c9a3110.
Since your change was applied there have been 3 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 8612163: 8281374: Add MD5.implCompress0 to Graal toBeInvestigated list after 8280978
  • 7b8073a: 8278381: [GCC 11] Address::make_raw() does not initialize rspec
  • 6ea7ef6: 8280373: Update Xalan serializer / SystemIDResolver to align with JDK-8270492

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Feb 9, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Feb 9, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Feb 9, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Feb 9, 2022

@yan-too Pushed as commit c9a3110.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Feb 9, 2022

Webrevs

@yan-too yan-too deleted the bp8274736 branch February 9, 2022 12:47
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant