Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

8293816: CI: ciBytecodeStream::get_klass() is not consistent #300

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator

@yan-too yan-too commented Nov 3, 2022

Backporting as a follow-up to JDK-8293044. Clean backport


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8293816: CI: ciBytecodeStream::get_klass() is not consistent

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk15u-dev pull/300/head:pull/300
$ git checkout pull/300

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/300
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk15u-dev pull/300/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 300

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 300

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk15u-dev/pull/300.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 3, 2022

👋 Welcome back yan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 746f5f589db5c1036f15fa47f8a48b2a12c921ce 8293816: CI: ciBytecodeStream::get_klass() is not consistent Nov 3, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2022

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2022

@yan-too This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8293816: CI: ciBytecodeStream::get_klass() is not consistent

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 3, 2022
@yan-too
Copy link
Collaborator Author

yan-too commented Nov 3, 2022

/integrate

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 3, 2022

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2022

Going to push as commit 74ce11f.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 3, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 3, 2022
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 3, 2022
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 3, 2022

@yan-too Pushed as commit 74ce11f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@yan-too yan-too deleted the bp8293816 branch November 3, 2022 14:05
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
1 participant