Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.
/ jdk16 Public archive

8258015: [JVMCI] JVMCI_lock shouldn't be held while initializing box classes #1

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

dougxc
Copy link
Member

@dougxc dougxc commented Dec 10, 2020

Backport of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8258015.

Applies cleanly.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8258015: [JVMCI] JVMCI_lock shouldn't be held while initializing box classes

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16 pull/1/head:pull/1
$ git checkout pull/1

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 10, 2020

👋 Welcome back dnsimon! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2020

@dougxc The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net label Dec 10, 2020
@dougxc dougxc marked this pull request as ready for review December 10, 2020 20:05
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 10, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 10, 2020

Webrevs

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2020

@dougxc This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8258015: [JVMCI] JVMCI_lock shouldn't be held while initializing box classes

Reviewed-by: kvn

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 10, 2020
@dougxc dougxc changed the title 8258015: [JVMCI] JVMCI_lock shouldn't be held while initializing box classes Backport d163c6fe2ec235a175b62ec821477d33b14841fe Dec 10, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d163c6fe2ec235a175b62ec821477d33b14841fe 8258015: [JVMCI] JVMCI_lock shouldn't be held while initializing box classes Dec 10, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2020

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@dougxc
Copy link
Member Author

dougxc commented Dec 10, 2020

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 10, 2020
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 10, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 10, 2020

@dougxc Pushed as commit fa77008.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.java.net integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants