-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
8257637: Update usage of "type" terminology in java.lang.annotation #27
Conversation
👋 Welcome back jboes! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
Webrevs
|
@FrauBoes This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 8 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
/integrate |
@FrauBoes Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. Pushed as commit 72dfba8. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This change is in line with upcoming changes in the JLS terminology ('type' versus 'class and interface').
For background see: https://download.java.net/java/early_access/jdk16/docs/specs/class-terminology-jls.html
For easier reviewing, paragraphs will only be reflowed before the PR is integrated.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Download
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16 pull/27/head:pull/27
$ git checkout pull/27