Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

JDK-8251200: False positive messages about missing comments for serialization #70

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons commented Dec 24, 2020

Using the @serial tag, a class can explicitly opt-in to being documented on the serialized form page. However, a class that does not want to opt-in should not be required to have a doc comment, and should not trigger the "missing comment" warning if there is no comment.

The fix is to check for the presence of the comment on a class before analyzing it to see if it contains @serial tags.

The code in Utils.getDocCommentTree0 is slightly refactored to allow a new predicate hasDocCommentTree to be added.


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8251200: False positive messages about missing comments for serialization

Reviewers

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16 pull/70/head:pull/70
$ git checkout pull/70

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 24, 2020

👋 Welcome back jjg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 24, 2020
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 24, 2020

@jonathan-gibbons The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • javadoc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.java.net label Dec 24, 2020
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 24, 2020

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@hns hns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, apart from two typos in a comment.

/**
* Checks whether an element has an associated doc copmment.
* @param element the element
* @return {@code true} if the eleme nt has a comment, and false otherwise
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

typo: eleme nt

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 5, 2021

@jonathan-gibbons This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8251200: False positive messages about missing comments for serialization

Reviewed-by: hannesw

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jan 5, 2021
@kusrinivasan
Copy link
Member

Looks good, saw the same typos Hannes noted.

@jonathan-gibbons
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 6, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 6, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 6, 2021

@jonathan-gibbons Pushed as commit eef43be.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@jonathan-gibbons jonathan-gibbons deleted the serial branch January 6, 2021 18:53
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated javadoc javadoc-dev@openjdk.java.net
3 participants