Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@adamfarley
Copy link

@adamfarley adamfarley commented Jun 4, 2021

Hi all,

This pull request contains a backport of commit d47a77d2 from the openjdk/jdk repository.

The commit being backported was authored by Nils Eliasson on 2 Jun 2021 and was reviewed by Roland Westrelin.

Thanks!


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-8267773: PhaseStringOpts::int_stringSize doesn't handle min_jint correctly

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u pull/127/head:pull/127
$ git checkout pull/127

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/127
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u pull/127/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 127

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 127

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u/pull/127.diff

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 4, 2021

👋 Welcome back afarley! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport d47a77d2d54ee8c41ef969b42b3336a646dffd7b 8267773: PhaseStringOpts::int_stringSize doesn't handle min_jint correctly Jun 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 4, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 4, 2021

@adamfarley This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8267773: PhaseStringOpts::int_stringSize doesn't handle min_jint correctly

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 19 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7616b2c: 8211227: Inconsistent TLS protocol version in debug output
  • 375be17: 8264786: [macos] All Swing/AWT apps cause Allow Notifications prompt to appear when app is launched
  • 6f948a7: 8267842: SIGSEGV in get_current_contended_monitor
  • 53dd617: 8260401: StackOverflowError on open WindowsPreferences
  • a680794: 8261354: SIGSEGV at MethodIteratorHost
  • 3ceb080: 8241248: NullPointerException in sun.security.ssl.HKDF.extract(HKDF.java:93)
  • 410f742: 8267235: [macos_aarch64] InterpreterRuntime::throw_pending_exception messing up LR results in crash
  • e0060a3: 8266802: Shenandoah: Round up region size to page size unconditionally
  • 5311c4d: 8267345: VM crashes during dumping classlist with -Xshare:dump option
  • e84e185: 8267100: [BACKOUT] JDK-8196415 Disable SHA-1 Signed JARs
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u/compare/cce99e57e19833e6783ba344864999ec8d475ba5...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 4, 2021
@adamfarley
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jun 4, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 4, 2021

@adamfarley
Your change (at version 10353f0) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 4, 2021

Webrevs

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

/integrate

@adamfarley, you should have waited with that until you have a jdk16u-fix-yes label on the bug. There is no automatic checking for maintainer approval in PRs (yet?) But it's no issue in this case since you aren't commiter in jdk-updates. So we should hold back with sponsoring until approval is given. I can sponsor it then (in case it gets approved in time, monday is the last chance for 16u).

@RealCLanger
Copy link
Contributor

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 7, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored ready Pull request is ready to be integrated labels Jun 7, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 7, 2021

@RealCLanger @adamfarley Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 7616b2c: 8211227: Inconsistent TLS protocol version in debug output
  • 375be17: 8264786: [macos] All Swing/AWT apps cause Allow Notifications prompt to appear when app is launched
  • 6f948a7: 8267842: SIGSEGV in get_current_contended_monitor
  • 53dd617: 8260401: StackOverflowError on open WindowsPreferences
  • a680794: 8261354: SIGSEGV at MethodIteratorHost
  • 3ceb080: 8241248: NullPointerException in sun.security.ssl.HKDF.extract(HKDF.java:93)
  • 410f742: 8267235: [macos_aarch64] InterpreterRuntime::throw_pending_exception messing up LR results in crash
  • e0060a3: 8266802: Shenandoah: Round up region size to page size unconditionally
  • 5311c4d: 8267345: VM crashes during dumping classlist with -Xshare:dump option
  • e84e185: 8267100: [BACKOUT] JDK-8196415 Disable SHA-1 Signed JARs
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u/compare/cce99e57e19833e6783ba344864999ec8d475ba5...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit d2d9533.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@openjdk openjdk bot removed the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 7, 2021
adamfarley referenced this pull request in openjdk/jdk Jun 7, 2021
…ectly

Co-authored-by: Adam Farley <afarley@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Shipilev <shade@openjdk.org>
Co-authored-by: Nils Eliasson <neliasso@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: roland
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants