Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection #6

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

evwhelan
Copy link

@evwhelan evwhelan commented Jan 25, 2021

Hi all,

This backports 7146776 for parity between update releases.

Thanks


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change must be properly reviewed

Issue

  • JDK-7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection

Download

$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk16u pull/6/head:pull/6
$ git checkout pull/6

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 25, 2021

👋 Welcome back ewhelan! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport db9c114d40cd20c2854121ed8b40a7c9ef8e59b3 7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection Jan 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2021

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2021

@evwhelan This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

7146776: deadlock between URLStreamHandler.getHostAddress and file.Handler.openconnection

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

  • e9dae4d: 8226810: Failed to launch JVM because of NullPointerException occured on System.props

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change.

➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type /integrate in a new comment. (Afterwards, your sponsor types /sponsor in a new comment to perform the integration).

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 25, 2021
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 25, 2021

Webrevs

@coffeys
Copy link
Contributor

coffeys commented Jan 25, 2021

/sponsor

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2021

@coffeys The change author (@evwhelan) must issue an integrate command before the integration can be sponsored.

@evwhelan
Copy link
Author

/integrate

@openjdk openjdk bot added the sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored label Jan 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2021

@evwhelan
Your change (at version 5436438) is now ready to be sponsored by a Committer.

@coffeys
Copy link
Contributor

coffeys commented Jan 25, 2021

/sponsor

@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jan 25, 2021
@openjdk openjdk bot added integrated Pull request has been integrated and removed sponsor Pull request is ready to be sponsored ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jan 25, 2021
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 25, 2021

@coffeys @evwhelan Since your change was applied there has been 1 commit pushed to the master branch:

  • e9dae4d: 8226810: Failed to launch JVM because of NullPointerException occured on System.props

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

Pushed as commit d3ecad7.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
backport clean integrated Pull request has been integrated
2 participants